Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 5661 - 5680 of 55,064
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2022, 8:50 am by Eric Goldman
(Analysis of CA AB587) Big Ruling for Free Speech: Most of Florida’s Social Media Censorship Law (SB 7072) Remains Enjoined–NetChoice v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:27 am by Will Newman
This provides an incentive for employees to sue other people who do not benefit from such a shield.This issue arose in a recent case before the state appellate court in Brooklyn. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 3:11 am by Earl Drott
Texas law permits people who lose their loved ones in collisions to pursue wrongful death claims. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Develop a strong work ethic:One of the biggest problems today—and you see it clearly in the context of today’s political discourse—is that people are disinclined to read and analyze anything that isn’t short, catchy, and superficial. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
It did not protect Native Americans, women, slaves, free people of color, or non-white immigrants. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:57 am by Evan M. Levow
Supreme Court established a four-part test for evaluating speedy trial claims in 1972’s Barker v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:54 am by Evan M. Levow
DWI attorney Evan Levow has dedicated 100% of his law practice to defending people charged in New Jersey municipal courts. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 10:54 am by Georgialee Lang
A six-year old indigenous girl was the focus of the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in ML v. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 7:17 am by John Floyd
  In fact, in 2017, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Turner v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
However, the present position in law is already in effect (owing to the impact of Strasbourg jurisprudence) that the court would not make such an order or finding unless there were exceptional and compelling reasons why it was in the public interest for the disclosure to be made: see Mersey Care NHS Trust v Ackroyd [2008] EMLR 1 (CA) at [17]. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 8:39 am
We see this discretion on full display in yesterday's Firearms Policy Coalition ruling.The court begins by determining that the carrying of guns by 18-to-20-year-olds falls within the text of the Second Amendment--concluding that people under the age of 21 fall within "the people," identified in the Second Amendment's, "right of the people to keep and bear arms. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:23 am by Eric Goldman
Whitepages The post Another Tough Ruling for People Search Databases–Camacho v. [read post]