Search for: "United States v. California" Results 5661 - 5680 of 13,862
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2014, 3:21 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
  The United States Supreme Court has also recognized the supremacy of federal law governing aviation safety. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 7:53 pm
United States(2007), which narrows the scope of qui tam claims by employee informants. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 1:42 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 56817 (SD TX, March 18, 2013), a Texas federal magistrate judge recommended that a Jewish inmate be permitted to move ahead with his suit seeking transfer to a different prison unit where kosher meals are available.In Williams v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
In the meantime, the United States SupremeCourt took up the lethal injection issue in Baze v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:10 pm by Margaret Wood
United States, was heard before the U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 7:35 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1158(a)(1) the INA expressly permits an asylum claim by “any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival)" (emphasis added). [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:27 pm by Lawrence Solum
In the United States, by contrast, the rhetoric of diversity is everywhere. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:29 pm by Lawrence Solum
For example, the Supreme Court of the United States, in trying to distinguish the “truly national” from the “truly local” in the context of the Commerce Clause, United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 6:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Adams runs Science On Trial, Inc., which "provides forensic consultation services across the United States and the United Kingdom. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 4:39 pm by William Baude
Melissa Sherry, arguing for the United States and supporting the deputized DEA agent’s side of the case, began by diving in to the differences between Calder and the current case. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
Article III provides that federal courts may hear “cases” and “controversies,” including “all cases, in law and equity, arising under . . . the laws of the United States . . . . [read post]