Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 5661 - 5680 of 6,362
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2014, 7:27 am by Elizabeth Wydra
United States that when individuals act in their official capacity as corporate agents, they “cannot be said to be exercising their personal rights and duties nor to be entitled to their purely personal privileges. [read post]
25 May 2021, 7:17 am by Don Asher
  If a 4-wheeler zips in front of a fast-moving semi-truck, for instance, the trucker may have no choice but to hit the brakes to avoid rear-ending the negligent driver. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:41 pm
   The complaint was filed in the face of many decisions of federal courts in the United States holding that a non-commercial "gripe" site about a trademark holder may use a domain name in the form www.trademark.com so long as the site itself is not confusing about whether it is sponsored by the trademark holder. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
It contributes to the creation and promotion of states’ national identity[20]. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 2:52 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
USCIS acknowledges in the new memorandum that “neither statutes nor regulations state the maximum allowable time of non-productive status. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 2:52 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
USCIS acknowledges in the new memorandum that “neither statutes nor regulations state the maximum allowable time of non-productive status. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:48 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
As you said in the lead in to this, he's been the head since its inception and he really has taken the state a long distance. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
In addition to the populations of Bikini and   Enewetak, the people of Rongelap and Utirik were also affected by radioactive fallout from the largest nuclear test the United States has ever conducted, the Bravo test held March 1, 1954. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
New York: [The Constitution] is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions natural and familiar, or novel, and even shocking, ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution of the United States…. [read post]