Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 5661 - 5680
of 6,869
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2010, 4:29 pm
” The focus of his speech was United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:57 pm
”We might have expected something similar in Holder v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:30 pm
On June 18, 2010, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia entered final judgment in the matter of Elisa Nili Cirilo Peres Ben-Rafael, et al. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
The media and blogosphere are flooded with coverage of the Court's decision Monday in Holder v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:21 pm
Remarks from the Surgeon General of the United States Public Health ServiceVice Admiral Regina M. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm
The legal, business, and scientific communities eagerly await the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bilski v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am
” Bill Mears of CNN, David Savage of the L.A. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:15 am
" (Ehrlich v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:35 pm
Specifically, in appointing the Special Master, the New Jersey Supreme Court ordered a review of the legal standard for the admissibility of eyewitness testimony known as the “Manson test,” established by the United States Supreme Court in 1977 and fully embraced by 48 out of 50 states, including New Jersey in 1988 in State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:45 am
May 26, 2010) By David Lanferman & Michael Cato In Beutz v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:45 am
May 26, 2010) By David Lanferman & Michael Cato In Beutz v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:40 am
United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:09 pm
United States, limiting the scope of its 2005 ruling in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 4:28 am
Although a number of collective bargaining agreements provide for a shorter “statutes of limitations” for filing disciplinary charges against an individual in a collective bargaining unit, it is unlikely that setting a greater statute of limitations for employees in a collective bargaining unit would survive judicial review for the reason set out by the Appellate Division in City of Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2d 1045 -- a collective bargaining agreement may… [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:37 am
v Bettenhauser, 95 NY2d 185, 188; see State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 6:16 pm
David I. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:16 pm
David I. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:36 pm
The Tafas v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
United States. [read post]
