Search for: "United States v. Heard"
Results 5661 - 5680
of 8,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
United States, which limits the scope of identity theft under a federal criminal statute. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am
The Legal Satyricon blog has a post about United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Murphy v. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am
Otherwise, we have not yet had a truly uniform statute of limitations throughout the United States. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 7:20 pm
In Chattin v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
” The justices also heard arguments in a companion case, Mohamad v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
As the letter from this Wednesday states, “[a]fter reconsideration of the issue, it is now the position of the United States that the amended section 5000A is constitutional” and “it is also now the position of the United States that, if [the] Court nevertheless concludes that Section 5000A is unconstitutional, that provision is severable from the remainder of the ACA. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
Travelling around in cyberspace, and covering as much ground as Kingsley, is Katfriend Miri Frankel who, having only just penned a guest post for PatLit on the SHIELD anti-troll draft bill in the United States, popped up in quite a different area of IP with "Sherlock Holmes and the Case of the Copyright Expiration Date", here. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:37 am
In connection with political elections--especially in the United States--the term "comeback kid" is often used for candidates who gain momentum after a difficult start, typically in situations in which many observers thought a campaign was over before it had really begun. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 7:30 am
” United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
For example, the Tillis-Coons bill (the “Special Counsel Integrity Act”) already provides that “An action filed under this subsection shall be heard and determined by a court of 3 judges not later than 14 days after the date on which the action is filed in accordance with the provisions of section 2284 of title 28, United States Code, and any appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 12:46 pm
This policy statement outlined more clearly what factors the Commission weighs in determine whether content is indecent.For more information on broadcast standards and the FCC, try a search of the Duke Libraries Catalog for the subject heading "Broadcasting -- Law and legislation -- United States. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 2:43 pm
Loretta Tutein, et al. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:54 am
At the recent WIP/IP conference, I heard no fewer than three people mention Kyle Bass. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 3:16 am
In the United States the parties want a final FRAND ruling (they disagree only on details), which Google will then appeal. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 6:32 am
The long-anticipated trial in the case of Diocese of Quincy, et al. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:28 am
The case is Knopf v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
The IPKat's April Update post on his intellectual property blogging friends, here, attracted a lot of interest and a good deal of correspondence -- but so far we've heard nothing from any fresh volunteers whom we hope will come along to do some blogging with us. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:00 am
Biden v. [read post]
