Search for: "BROWN v. BROWN" Results 5681 - 5700 of 12,893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm by Viking
Brown, 669 F.3d 10, 18 & n.12 (1st Cir. 2012) (citing Wikipedia for its definition of "sovereign citizen movement," one of a criminal defendant’s "atypical legal beliefs"), Murdock v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, 96 NY2d 300, 303; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, [*2]87-88). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, 96 NY2d 300, 301-304 [2001]) and that plaintiff was damaged as a result of such negligence (see Bixby v Somerville, 62 AD3d at 1139). [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:52 pm by Orin Kerr
Destroying property is generally a seizure of that property, Brown v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 10:20 am by Ronald Mann
ShareWednesday’s argument in Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
The majority (Lord Sumption and Lord Brown dissenting) thought it would not, though the issue was referred to the CJEU as the matter was not acte clair. [read post]
30 May 2007, 10:54 am
However, Ackerman wants to moor truly transformative changes, such as the New Deal, in the amending text of Article V of the Constitution. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am by Dave
Reasoning Although Baroness Hale made it look relatively easy, this result was rather more difficult to achieve (as is clear from Lords Rodger and Brown’s judgments). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:26 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
From Tuesday 20 March 2012 over three days are the linked appeals of Perry & Ors v Serious Organised Crime Agency and Perry & Ors (No. 2) v Serious Organised Crime Agency, which will be heard by a panel of nine (L Phillips, L Hale, L Brown, L Judge, L Kerr, L Wilson, L Clarke, L Reed and Sir Anthony Hughes). [read post]
25 Jan 2025, 4:52 am by jonathanturley
On Friday, the Supreme Court agreed to review a potentially blockbuster religion clause case in Oklahoma Charter School Board v. [read post]