Search for: "Bear v. State"
Results 5681 - 5700
of 14,538
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2012, 10:05 am
Edwards Aquifer Authority v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 10:22 am
In yesterday’s Glass v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:47 pm
Second, in 2001, in Circuit City Stores v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s 5-4 2019 decision in Rucho v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:13 am
The state has no compelling interest in censoring speech it finds “repugnant,” the court wrote, and the First Amendment does not allow remedying unwanted speech with enforced silence (Honeyfund.com, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:54 pm
In Mohamoud v RB Kensington and Chelsea and Saleem v Wandsworth LBC [2015] EWCA Civ 780, the Court of Appeal were faced with the difficult argument about the interaction between section 11, Children Act 2004 and possession proceedings brought by a local authority against unsuccessful applicants for homelessness assistance. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 11:18 am
House of Representatives in support of the respondents in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:29 am
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 5:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:24 pm
First, in Meacham v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:23 am
East West, LLC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Against this backdrop it bears remembering that Chief Justice Roberts has himself been a reliably conservative vote and voice on many important constitutional matters, and that he often eschews incrementalism in favor of sweeping conservative change.One important example is Roberts’ authorship of the 2013 case of Shelby County v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 1:55 pm
Part I briefly reviews the doctrine of Barron v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 10:53 am
The gun owners argued that the rule violated their right to “keep and bear arms” under the Constitution’s Second Amendment. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 9:46 am
Munich v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 5:49 am
Plaintiffs bear the burden of proving causation as part of their case-in-chief. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:42 pm
It might be possible, as Andy Koppelman has argued, to strike down DOMA and uphold state bans on same-sex marriage if the Court applies the Romer v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
June 23, 2011) (allegation that defendant “failed to train, warn or educate” physicians failed to state a plausible claim because no such duty exists); Lemon v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 11:43 am
PSEG Power New York, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 9:00 pm
., L.P. et al. v. [read post]
