Search for: "Blood v. Blood"
Results 5681 - 5700
of 7,197
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2010, 9:43 am
Krueger appeals a judgment of conviction, entered following a jury trial, for operating a motor vehicle with a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his blood (fifth offense), contrary to Wis. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 8:16 am
In Horton v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 9:02 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:31 am
TiVo, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:31 am
TiVo, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 6:22 pm
In the case of California v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 7:49 am
The Supreme Court granted certiorari on November 1, 2010, in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 1:24 pm
See Pelman v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:46 pm
P.C. v MVAIC, 2010 NY Slip Op 51885(U)(App. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:30 am
Chamber, Deceased v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:11 am
I’m charmed by the hospitality, but I don’t have a date, and, moreover, it’s kind of blood Christmas cheer. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 10:07 am
In Fabricius v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 7:28 am
" (United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 12:52 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:31 am
The Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) an amicus curiae brief in the AMP v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:22 am
Pelman v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:21 am
In this view I was supported by the comments of Judge Newman in the case of DPP-v-Avery (2001) who stated that ‘the wearing of a mask can be a potent means of demonstrating in a lawful manner. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:51 am
Initiating disciplinary action based on anonymous allegations of wrongdoingWilson v City of White Plains, 259 AD2d 756, reversed, 95 NY2d 783Anonymous communications that allege improper conduct by an employee place the appointing authority on the horns of a dilemma. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:55 am
Other cases as in R. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:57 am
Another dreary day in Londontown, but the IPKat Team is here to wish you a very happy day filled with intellectual property goodness.US Supreme Court to hear Stanford v Roche patent fight: Yesterday the US Supreme Court justices agreed to hear Stanford University's claim against Roche Holding AG in respect of patents for methods of testing the effectiveness of AIDS treatments by measuring the HIV concentration in blood plasma. [read post]
