Search for: "Board of Adjustment" Results 5681 - 5700 of 6,175
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2009, 11:26 am
The PTO's appellate board - the BPAI - rejected the most recent application under the judge-made doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting. [read post]
7 May 2009, 4:58 pm
The figures used for the cap are captured from the Department of Human Services administrative rules, averaged across the board. [read post]
6 May 2009, 10:01 am by Mike Inman
Does VA law require the board to conduct a reserve study or just to have a reserve? [read post]
5 May 2009, 6:21 pm
… To date, the company has achieved an adjustment of more than 6,000 employees and continues to expect a total synergy-related adjustment of approximately 9,000 employees. [read post]
4 May 2009, 4:29 am
Byrne's chat board post was later removed and re-posted with his name attached to it, after I complained to the SEC. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 4:03 pm
The website HOALeader.com (created to provide support and information to board members and other HOA leaders) recently conducted a survey of HOA leaders on how they were dealing with the problem. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 2:06 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing alleging discrimination or other conduct prohibited by applicable anti-discrimination or equal employment opportunity law; a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board; or a charge or complaint with any other administrative agency to the extent that right may not be waived by private agreement absent judicial or governmental supervision; provided that Dr. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 10:10 am by Michelle C. Laubin
A free curriculum is available from the National School Boards Association (NSBA) to address cyberbullying issues at NSBA. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:11 am
If Apple could give these developers the opportunity to easily adjust their iPhone/iPod touch apps for use with a new tablet, the chicken-and-egg problem of getting developers on board would be solved. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 6:18 am
The IRS says the following are the only financial needs considered immediate and heavy: Expenses for (or necessary to obtain) medical care that would be deductible under Code section 213(d) (determined without regard to whether the expenses exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income); Costs directly related to the purchase of a principal residence for the employee (excluding mortgage payments); Payment of tuition, related educational fees, and room and board expenses, for up to… [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 2:00 pm
JUSTICE GINSBURG: When -- when I asked that you question, you said that one issue of fact was whether the board was acting in response to improper influence, to racial politics. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:22 am
In addition, FAS 115-2 requires the company to recognize the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings, as of the beginning of the period in which FAS 115-2 is adopted, with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income.The PCAOB staff advised auditors to evaluate whether the company's accounting for and disclosure of the changes are in accordance with the FASB guidance. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 8:04 pm
In fact, California AGI is defined as federal adjusted gross income from all sources reduced or increased by all California income adjustments. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:59 am
It is hard to convey just how dangerous this was and is....Read how no one is even close to debating "ticking time bomb" scenarios as they strap people to boards and drown them until they break. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 12:03 am
This translates into: A decrease to adjust for one-time expenditures in the 2008-2009 biennium related to S.B. 103's implementation and associated population reductions. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 9:38 am
”    The judge  found a basic (”lodestar”) fee of $6,012,802.90, and then tacked on a 1.75 upward adjustment. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 10:00 pm
Question presented: Whether the Railway Labor Act authorizes courts to set aside final arbitration awards for alleged violations of due process by the National Railroad Adjustment Board, and if the Board can adopt a new, retroactive interpretation of the standards governing its arbitration proceedings. [read post]