Search for: "Childs v. State"
Results 5681 - 5700
of 21,041
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2009, 7:01 am
Danny Wayne Grammer took a plea bargain for ten years deferred adjudication on a nine-count indictment charging him with aggravated sexual assault and indecency with a child. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:00 am
"At sentencing, the district court had ordered restitution of $305,219.86, which represents the total amount of Vicky's loss to date that has not already been paid by other defendants.The case is United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 12:36 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 2:15 pm
Click here to access the entire decision Hascall v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 2:15 pm
Click here to access the entire decision Hascall v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 1:57 am
Fawzy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:15 am
"
State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 5:37 am
State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 8:36 pm
The present leading case on relocation is Baures v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 6:13 am
In Delgado v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:31 pm
In Delgado v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:47 am
In doing so, the Court stated that, `a State has no business telling a man, sitting alone in his own house, what books he may read or what films he may watch. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:49 am
State, 2011 WY 75, 2011 Wyo. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:46 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 8:02 am
DLH v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 6:42 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 6:39 am
State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 7:14 am
” Gangemi v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 4:01 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers v Serco Ltd (t/a Serco Docklands) [2011] EWCA Civ 226 (04 March 2011) MN (Tanzania), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 193 (04 March 2011) H v City & County of Swansea & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 195 (02 March 2011) RO, R (on the application of) v East Riding of Yorkshire Council & Anor [2011] EWCA… [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 7:49 am
A 5-2 decision in yesterday's State v. [read post]
