Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 5681 - 5700 of 7,291
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2010, 5:19 am by Rita Handrich
  “I truly wanted to believe…” “For the longest time I clung to the hope that X was true, but finally I had to let it go and accept the facts…” Let them know there is a “wanting to believe” Charlie Brown in each of us. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 1:49 am by Sanjana Hattotuwa
TOR is one such tool, and one I’ve used for quite a while now. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:35 am by rgeorges
Additionally, I am anxious to see what Flash 10.1 does for the Droid X big, beautiful screen. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 6:46 am by Michael Viola
With this in mind, Oksana’s request that she receive $40,000 in support does not seem so out of line. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:56 am
(o) "X-ray or imaging services" shall mean diagnostic imaging techniques which shall include but not be limited to the following: (1) conventional x-ray or radiology; (2) fluoroscopy; (3) digital radiography; (4) computed tomography; (5) magnetic resonance imaging; (6) nuclear imaging; (7) ultrasonography; and (8) angiography. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 8:48 am by Dan
During the time I represented this truck manufacturer, I became very good friends (and I still am) with one of their executives and this executive would keep me apprised of the industry (and he still does). [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 9:26 pm
(b) A health care provider or a referring practitioner may not present or cause to be presented to any individual or third party payor or other entity a claim, bill, or other demand for payment for clinical laboratory services, pharmacy services, radiation therapy services, physical therapy services or x-ray or imaging services furnished pursuant to a referral prohibited by this subdivision. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm by Lawrence Solum
I articulate two invariant culpability principles, “Invariant culpability when acts are aggregated” and “Invariant culpability when risk-exposures are aggregated,” that formalize this idea. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 12:21 am by Orin Kerr
Such laws generally follow the following structure: 1) Anyone who intentionally does privacy-invading thing “X” commits a crime, 2) However, the government can do “X” if it has an appropriate court order based on a certain level of cause, and 3) Victims of “X” have a civil remedy against whoever does “X. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 7:45 pm by The Namby Pamby
B) When does that contingency fee pay me? [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:32 pm by Kara OBrien
  Reversing a number of federal court decisions, 922(c) explicitly grants employees the right to a jury trial but Goldsmith does not think the provision is retroactive. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:34 am
Of those fifty-five lawsuits, I estimate that ECUSA itself was a party to about half of them. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:41 am
The Supreme Court held thatIP addresses are personal data in the sense of data protection law;the collection of these addresses violates data protection law because it occurs without the consent of the concerned persons;the interest in the enforcement of IP rights does not justify the violation of data protection law: the interest of internet users in the protection of their personality rights (read: right to remain pseudo-anonymous) prevails over the interest of right owners to enforce… [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 11:14 am
" You see, California does consider fairness when handling these types of issues. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 7:33 am by Lawrence Solum
I articulate two invariant culpability principles, “Invariant culpability when acts are aggregated” and “Invariant culpability when risk-exposures are aggregated,” that formalize this idea. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:13 pm by charonqc
A government minister cannot decide that I would like to pass laws which require people to do X. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 7:48 am by Asbestos Litigation
NT Nobody does Sandra Bullock in a corner Box Office Report [read post]