Search for: "Fast v. Fast"
Results 5681 - 5700
of 6,847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2010, 7:22 am
” In Ochocinska v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:17 pm
So here's an excerpt about a kooky little copyright case called Strachborneo v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 1:58 pm
Mickey v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
Putting it a different way, I like the effect of a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy with it's a relatively fast, inexpensive fresh start, to the results in a Chapter 13, because I don't think a five year "fresh start in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy" is either fresh, or fast. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:13 pm
After “Change” has transformed all the land, and caused the lobbyist lion to lay down with the consumerist lamb, and we have fully “immanentized the eschaton,” regulatory capture will become a thing of the past—along with, no doubt, greed, ugliness, and even those annoying headaches you get from eating ice cream too fast! [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 2:36 pm
"Not so fast, my friend," said the CCA today. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 1:33 pm
Supreme Court of Ohio: City of Barberton v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 1:33 pm
Supreme Court of Ohio: City of Barberton v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:46 am
In the first, Cooper Cameron v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please follow this link: Bastien v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Duh. - ECJ ruling in Coty Prestige Lancaster Group GmbH v Simex Trading AG (IPKat) (Managing IP) Frisdranken/Red Bull dispute is referred to ECJ: Frisdranken Industrie Winters v Red Bull GmbH (Class 46) A serious reference or is somebody winding us up? [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
In-house, things come at you fast and come at you furiously. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:01 am
A human can only pump out consistently high quality posts — his take as little as 10 minutes — by being able to: Think imaginatively about issues; Organize those thoughts in the head; Write creatively; Type fast as hell. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
County of Los Angeles; to "protect against a litigant playing fast and loose with the courts"; and to implement "general considerations of the orderly administration of justice and regard for the dignity of judicial proceedings," Prilliman v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Holliman v. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 6:17 am
See also Hathcock v. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 6:08 am
” [Pat Murphy, Lawyers USA "Benchmarks"] Tags: California, hot coffee, insurance Related posts November 18 roundup (5) January 16 roundup (0) Yet another McDonald’s coffee style lawsuit (5) Yes, tea is hot, too: Zeynep Inanli v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:55 am
A press release today from the UK's Intellectual Property Office informs the IPKat that the new database of fast-tracked green inventions, designed to help the development of environmentally-friendly technology, was launched today by new Intellectual Property Minister Baroness Wilcox. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:07 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 12:24 am
" Both MPs suggested that fast tracking the bill through summer hearings is not the right approach. [read post]
