Search for: "Good v. Good"
Results 5681 - 5700
of 76,265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2010, 8:58 am
Well the question may be good but the answer could be very long. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:03 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm
California v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:09 am
In the light of this silence, a case has recently been referred to the CJEU, and ahead of its decision an Advocate General stepped in to provide some well-needed insight into the law and its interpretation.The case of Schweppes SA v Red Paralela SL related to the sale of soda water. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:20 am
This is the question at the heart of the General Court’s judgment in Apart v EUIPO - S. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:47 am
Fra.bo SpA v Deutsche Vereinigung des Gas-und Wasserfaches eV (DVGW) – Technisch – Wissenschaftlicher Verein (Case C-171/11); [2012] WLR (D) 203 “Article 28EC of the EC Treaty on the free movement of goods, applied to standardisation and certification activities of a private law body, where the products certified by that body were considered by national legislation to be compliant with national law and where that restricted the marketing of products which were not… [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
In the recent case of Graf v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 6:07 am
" Id. at * 9, quoting Ashworth v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 6:23 am
Good news for serious IP scholars is that the judgment in Robyn Rihanna Fenty v Arcadia [2013] EWHC 2310 (Ch), not yet posted on BAILII, can be read in full here. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 2:00 am
In Miller v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Duncan Kennedy, The Bitter Ironies of Williams V. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
Last week, the court of appeals decided State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 12:54 am
Haddick v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:47 am
Oh, for the good old days of State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 1:09 am
The Court of Appeal noted that the law in relation to confiscation has undergone a seismic shift following the Supreme Court’s decision in R v Waya [2012] UKSC 51 and it took the opportunity to review the pre – Waya authorities to determine the extent to which they remain good law. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:59 am
Indeed, the Sixth Circuit specifically held as much in a well-known 1992 case, United States v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 4:33 am
Scott v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 7:03 am
A: I thought about it and decided it probably didn’t apply So long as 512(f) turns on the sender’s subjective good faith, the sender automatically defeats a 512(f) claim with a deposition transcript like this. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
See USITC Complaint.K-V Seeks Relief Under The 1930 Tariff Act The 1930 Tariff Act, as amended, empowers the ITC to grant relief if it finds, inter alia, “unfair methods of competition and unfair acts in the importation” of goods whose sales threaten “to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 3:21 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
