Search for: "Head v State"
Results 5681 - 5700
of 14,740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2022, 2:03 pm
From Tika v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 1:52 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:35 am
Assn. v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 3:40 am
Mar v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:22 pm
(reprinted with permission from Lyle Denniston Law News) The argument in Dollar General v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
Supreme Court landmark case, United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
Reassuringly it affirms that Creative Commons is not an anti-copyright device but a provider of handy guidance to would-be users, and it doesn't threaten readers with Moorhouse v University of New South Wales, choosing to explain the legal position instead. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
Does the Constitution say what its “plain meaning” appears to say to the eyes of non-lawyers, or does Marbury v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 9:30 am
Flanagan v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:47 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm
Does 1-2 et. al. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:53 am
United States is one instituted by the executive branch against a former head of the executive branch. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 1:35 pm
Those duties and powers are given to the local authority (the state) not the social worker, and the social worker is the agent of the state. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 11:50 am
Picture me sitting in a giant auditorium tackling the essay portion of my BAR examination when my least favorite subject rears its ugly head. . . [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 9:45 am
Dixon Gas Club LLC v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:03 pm
You are not expected to know every single answer about an event that occurred months or years ago off the top of your head. [read post]
Case Law: Hayes v Willoughby, Injunction granted in leading harassment action breached – Samuel Rowe
3 Apr 2019, 4:31 pm
Their Lordships stated that rationality was a familiar concept in public law but distinguished it from reasonableness and, in particular, the categories of Wednesbury unreasonableness. [read post]
29 May 2009, 5:30 am
Migis v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 8:15 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 7:06 am
A key difference between appeals in state and federal court is that in state court you can appeal any court ruling, even if the case is not even resolved. [read post]
