Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 5681 - 5700
of 6,156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2008, 3:27 am
This one is often known as the adverse testimony privilege, and is popularly known as the privilege which means "a wife can't be forced to testify against her husband" or vice versa.A recent decision from a federal district court in the Southern District of New York - U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:04 pm
In Thompson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 10:49 pm
Soulsbury v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:07 am
The New Jersey divorce judge had ordered the husband to pay his ex-wife 18 months of rehabilitative alimony. [read post]
25 May 2008, 8:02 pm
" " In holding the husband to the deal, the court seemingly disregards the fact that the alimony probably now puts the wife in a better cash position than the husband. [read post]
25 May 2008, 12:23 pm
The traditional loss of consortium claim of the English common law had only authorized a cause of action for a husband whose wife was injured, but Florida courts had expanded it, in line with the developing law of the marital relationship recognizing men and women as equal partners, to allow women to bring a loss of consortium claim for injury to their husbands. [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:17 am
Melvin Lowe (NFP) - In a 2-1 opinion, Judge Kirsch concludes: "In light of the total distribution of marital property, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to award Wife Husband's survivor benefit. [read post]
20 May 2008, 11:54 am
US v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 12:39 am
In Tsirlin v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 10:59 pm
In Prichep, a wife with an annual income of only $4,000, sought an interim award of attorney’s fees from her husband, a cardio-vascular surgeon, with an annual income in excess of $400,000.00. [read post]
17 May 2008, 9:53 am
Sagl's home was destroyed by fire, and Chubb Insurance Company of Canada refused to pay for her losses, the stage had been set for an ugly battle.In the 2007 Ontario Superior Court of Justice case of Sagl v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 9:54 pm
Wagner v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 7:33 pm
The decision follows hard on the heels of an opposite outcome for the husband and wife plaintiffs in Perry Homes v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 10:50 am
Erp, considered the valuation of an RV dealership acquired by the husband and wife during their marriage. [read post]
15 May 2008, 2:16 pm
The Eighth Circuit opinion is Cole is a bit opaque in affirming the sentences of a husband and wife convicted federal gun crimes. [read post]
15 May 2008, 8:37 am
It is fortunate, for the future of our legal system - (a) that there cannot be that many men / women in a position to write memoirs after being the wife / husband /’consort of a prime minister and able to profit by writing memoirs, and (b) be in the frame for an appointment as a ’senior’ judge or otherwise. [read post]
14 May 2008, 4:27 pm
HORVATH V. [read post]
12 May 2008, 1:41 pm
Campbell v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 11:11 am
After the QDRO was entered, the Judge recognized the ex-wife's right to receive 17% of the ex-husband's monthly pension. [read post]
7 May 2008, 9:34 pm
" On one occasion, when the employee and her supervisor were riding alone in a squad car, and the employee was speaking to her husband on her cell phone about lunch plans, the supervisor grabbed the phone out of the employee's hands and told her husband, "I don't know what you're saying, but I'm eating your wife. [read post]
