Search for: "Law v. USA" Results 5681 - 5700 of 6,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Although several Circuit Court decisions have used the so-called “scope of the patent test” when considering whether patent settlement agreements violate the antitrust laws, including the Eleventh Circuit in litigation involving the same K-DUR patent settlement agreement (see Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
One of the early cases we covered was Fisher v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:45 pm by Larry
The Court of International Trade has issued the much anticipated (at least by me) decision on the merits in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 9:14 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court will say about civil marriage in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:54 am by Marvin Ammori
The best general introduction may be yesterday's USA Today article (or this Jon Stewart clip). [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 9:34 pm
The opinion concerns section 163 of Division B of Public Law 111â€"68, which must have been enacted on a day that the guy who usually comes up with improbable acronyms (PROTECT Act, USA PATRIOT Act, the SNIFF Act, the PUMP Act, etc. etc.) was out sick. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
For example, in many law schools, the sky was falling when United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 1:15 am
"Right now, certainly the abolitionists are gaining some steam," said Daniel Medwed, a law professor at the University of Utah. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps considers Kavanaugh’s “sole opinion on the issue of choice, a 2017 dissent in Garza v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:32 am by James Bickford
”  The cert. petitions in that case, United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:54 pm by Ben Sheffner
And her order is nonetheless important, and extraordinary, for several reasons.Fair Use Memorandum and Order in Sony v. [read post]