Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 5681 - 5700
of 21,107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2014, 6:49 am
Plaintiffs assert that if Defendant is found to be liable for the claim, even if Defendant denied the claim in good faith, Defendant is still liable for penalties for tardy payment. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 7:02 am
Once the defendant’s criminal case is terminated either by a dismissal, plea, conviction, or acquittal. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 5:11 am
Multiple Liable Parties Medical malpractice cases often implicate multiple parties, not just the direct care physicians of the affected patient. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:47 am
Occasionally, a Buffalo personal injury lawsuit may involve a claim of “negligent entrustment” on the part of one of the defendants. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 1:13 pm
In any event, given that the board was overwhelmingly independent and secured a 45% premium, all-cash offer just before the debt markets collapsed, it's almost impossible to see how these directors will be found liable at trial. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
., 2014 ONCA 419 [49] Pinnock submits that no jury acting reasonably could have found him liable for this tort. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants were liable in negligence, waiver of tort and for breaches of Canada’s Competition Act and British Columbia’s Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 5:39 pm
The Plaintiff filed in Philadelphia County presumably due to State Farm's presence in that county.Generally speaking, under Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1006, proper venue for a lawsuit involving a motor vehicle accident is in the county where the accident happened or where the defendant resides.After the Plaintiff filed suit in Philadelphia in the Pippett matter, Defense counsel for the tortfeasor filed preliminary objections asserting improper venue and argued that… [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 10:22 am
But the landlord probably would be liable to, say, plumbers who come to service the building, and possibly even the ex-convict’s social guests. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 5:24 am
” In its analysis, the Court of Appeals first noted that defendant’s reliance on § 29-20-205 was “misguided. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 7:26 am
The Defendant is Likely to be Held Liable The more effective your legal argument (i.e., the more likely it is that the court will hold the defendant responsible for your injuries should the case go to trial), the more likely the defendant will attempt to settle for an amount closer to what you’re looking for. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 11:15 am
The former - where a party expends attorney's fees to determine the existence of an indemnification obligation - is distinguished from the latter - where a party expends attorney's fees to defend itself from a third party claim which was the obligation of the other party to defend. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 11:31 am
The plaintiff sued the defendant, and the defendant agreed he was liable, so the issue at trial was damages. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 11:31 am
The plaintiff sued the defendant, and the defendant agreed he was liable, so the issue at trial was damages. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 7:22 am
Bell’s testimony fit the nature of the case. [read post]
2 Jul 2016, 7:34 am
At the time, authorities say, defendant’s blood-alcohol concentration was 0.18. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 9:42 pm
Specifically, the defendant argued that it was an ordinary negligence claim, and in support of its assertion, stated that the plaintiff’s attorney deemed it ordinary negligence at a pretrial conference. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 12:05 pm
Here’s how he determined the fine, per the Federal Circuit’s ruling back in December 2009 that companies could be held liable for up to $500 for every single item falsely marked. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:11 am
The law defines a commercial use as either in connection with an internal commercial use or an actual arm’s length sale or other arm’s length commercial transfer of a useful end result of such commercial use. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 7:04 pm
With respect to Perfect 10’s trademark claims, the Ninth Circuit found as follows: “To be liable for contributory trademark infringement, a defendant must have (1) ‘intentionally induced’ the primary infringer to infringe, or (2) continued to supply an infringing product to an infringer with knowledge that the infringer is mislabeling the particular product supplied. [read post]
