Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 5681 - 5700
of 42,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2023, 9:49 am
E.A.C. matter, another case was released on a similar issue: In The Matter of A.H. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:27 am
The Court serially ruled that the petitioner stated sufficient grounds to dissolve Matrix Model Staffing, Inc. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 9:41 am
While this case originated in Alabama, the 11th Circuit’s ruling in the matter can affect employers and employees in Georgia. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Why does this matter? [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 4:48 pm
Although formal judicial admissions may look like the quasi-judicial admissions found in Rule 801 of the Texas Rules of Evidence (statements made during judicial proceedings which are exceptions to the hearsay rule and constitute some evidence, but not conclusive evidence), they actually work more like the discovery admissions of Rule 198 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, because they do constitute conclusive… [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 5:12 am
Plaintiffs' expert does not present persuasive contrary evidence. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:00 pm
In People v Hawkins (2008 NY Slip Op 09254 [11/25/08]) the Court of Appeals provided counsel with further guidance as to what is required to preserve errors for review as a matter of law. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
” On the other hand, Qassim asserts, nor did Hamdi grant the government “carte blanche to rely on hearsay as a matter of course. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:55 am
Melber emphasized “this thing matters a ton. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:12 am
Rule 11(a) of the Rules of the Policy is a two clause provision. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:42 am
A finding of necessity takes into account such factors as the significance of the matters, weight of the testimony, and availability of other evidence” (S&S Hotel Ventures Ltd. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
In REVERSING the lower court's order, the Second Department ruled that the evidence presented at the hearing established that the respondent did not reside in her mother's household at the time of the accident and, thus, was not a covered person under the subject policy: A person's status as a resident of an insured's household "requires something more than temporary or physical presence and requires at least some degree of permanence and intention to… [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 2:41 pm
The court ruled that “upskirt” photographs are not illegal, no matter how disturbing they may be to some, and that the Texas law making them illegal, the “anti-creepshot“ law, is unconstitutionally violative of the photographer’s free speech and freedom of expression. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 8:46 am
As part of her March 12 ruling, Justice Lefkowitz granted the motion to intervene, and decided to use this ruling as an occasion to issue a final order in the case, granting summary judgment against the plaintiffs. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:08 am
But there is good evidence that it does matter. [read post]
26 May 2016, 1:11 pm
That was based on the fact that pretrial decisions by Judge Alsup had already favored Google, and his jury instructions on the "fair use" rules were unbelievably unfair and biased. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 8:30 am
The district court did say that it had no subject matter jurisdiction over the state law IIED claim because it had already dismissed the federal claims. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 1:48 pm
I cannot do that based on the evidence proffered in this motion. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 8:42 am
That certainly sounds like a simple matter, and a reasonable rule, but, as with many things in law, the matter is never as simple as it seems. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 10:53 am
” a Detroit federal district judge asked me when I was arguing my a motion to suppress evidence. [read post]
