Search for: "Mays v. Paul" Results 5681 - 5700 of 7,412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am by Eugene Volokh
But the Sixth Circuit has clearly held that local ordinances may not be used in this way to interfere with peaceful demonstrations. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 2:05 am by Sally Peat
Our tutor Paul was a former actor who now coached prominent people (such as a major politician whose name can’t be repeated here!) [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 3:37 pm
The IPKat craves your indulgence as he turns to Case T‑504/11 Paul Hartmann AG v OHIM, Protecsom SAS,  a 4 February ruling of the First Chamber of the General Court of the European Union. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm
The 1709 Blog notes, among other things, a procedural nasty that has emanated from the Dataco v Stan James database right dispute: a (wait for it ....) an application by the claimant to re-re-re-re-re-amend their Particulars of Claim. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 9:50 am by Garrett Hinck
  ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Robert Chesney argued that the government's arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 12:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
Last Friday, the Seventh Circuit handed down an interesting opinion about libel injunctions in McCarthy v. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by William Ford
Robert Chesney dissected the most important disputes in Doe v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:43 am by Ben
The case is Nirvana LLC v Marc Jacobs International LLC et al. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 2:43 am
Apparently, Dunnes’ assumed that Karen Millen’s designs were nothing but the combination of features drawn from a number of earlier designs, such as a grey Dolce & Gabana knit top and a Paul Smith blue striped shirt. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
In the words of the Fifth District Appellate Court in Schofield v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:50 am by Quinta Jurecic
After a brief “health and comfort break,” Sheeran iscross-examined by Navy Lieutenant Paul Morris. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 11:18 am by Garrett Hinck
  ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Andrew Keane Woods summarized the key issues to watch as Microsoft v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:53 am by Tara Hofbauer
Paul discussed the Supreme Court’s decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:28 am by David DePaolo
He also demanded payment for his wife's attendant care services, and a ruling on his need for further medical treatment, including additional home modifications.In May 2014, Administrative Law Judge Paul DeWeese ruled that the UR decision was defective. [read post]