Search for: "Office of Information and Privacy" Results 5681 - 5700 of 16,320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2018, 1:51 pm by David Kris
S. 438, 464 (1928), which held that telephone wiretapping was not a Fourth Amendment “search” because there “was no entry of the houses or offices of the defendants,” to Katz v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 1:35 am by INFORRM
Whilst there are overlaps, privacy law is conceptually different to defamation law: the loss of autonomy/control over private information does not logically require identification. [read post]
  The second line embodies the third-party doctrine, under which an individual has no legitimate expectation of privacy in information voluntarily turned over to third parties. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:54 am by Hannah Kris
Privacy advocates and law enforcement officials alike  have long said the case could have wide-reaching implications for all sorts of personal information that has historically been able to be handed over to courts as part of third-party doctrine. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:47 am by Mark Walsh
Solicitor General Noel Francisco leads the contingent from his office, joined by his deputies Edwin Kneedler and Malcolm Stewart, as well as a handful of others. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:07 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
Carpenter appealed to the Sixth Circuit and then to the Supreme Court, arguing the officers violated his Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am by Sabrina McCubbin
Maryland are examples of the application of the third-party doctrine—the legal principle that when an individual voluntarily gives information to a third party, the privacy interest in that information is forfeit. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 10:18 am by Orin Kerr
Nor do we address other business records that might incidentally reveal location information. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:23 am by Fox Rothschild LLP
Widman is a partner in the firm’s Litigation Department, based in its Chicago office. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
One particularly egregious case involved an officer who allegedly planned to hand sensitive information on witnesses to the family member of a convicted murderer. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 12:03 pm by Dave Maass
These include querying the database for personal reasons, searching data on celebrities, sharing passwords or access, providing information to unauthorized third parties, and researching a firearm the officer intends to purchase. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 2:33 am by INFORRM
There was no serious dispute that they had a reasonable expectation of privacy or confidence in the information in question. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by David Zorn
First, they point to legitimate concerns about the personal privacy of the study participants and their personally identifiable information. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:30 am by Varellas & Varellas
Kentucky law requires that the following rights of nursing home residents be protected: The right to be fully informed of the rules and regulations of the facility as well as the rights of the resident The right to privacy, to be treated with dignity and respect and to be suitably dressed at all times The right to be free from physical and mental abuse, including verbal and sexual abuse and corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion The right to be free from physical or chemical… [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:30 am by Varellas & Varellas
Kentucky law requires that the following rights of nursing home residents be protected: The right to be fully informed of the rules and regulations of the facility as well as the rights of the resident The right to privacy, to be treated with dignity and respect and to be suitably dressed at all times The right to be free from physical and mental abuse, including verbal and sexual abuse and corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion The right to be free from physical or chemical… [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:15 pm
“We are fighting on all fronts to protect the personal information of Oaklanders from federal agencies such as ICE,” says Brian Hofer, chair of the Oakland Privacy Advisory Commission and core member of Oakland Privacy, a signatory to the Amazon letter. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:00 am by Hanlon Law, PA
Call our offices at (813) 228-7095 or contact us online to speak with Mr. [read post]