Search for: "People v Weeks" Results 5681 - 5700 of 15,557
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts The trial in Serafin v Malkiewicz continued before Jay J on 6, 7, 8 and 9 November 2017. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 3:44 pm
People-to-People Travel ➥   In accordance with the NSPM, OFAC is requiring that (1) all people-to-people nonacademic educational travel be conducted under the auspices of an organization that is subject to U.S. jurisdiction and that sponsors such exchanges to promote people-to-people contact, and (2) such travelers be accompanied by a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction who is a representative of the sponsoring… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:51 am
Trump’s chief of staff, tilted the White House away from criticism of Beijing in an interview on Fox News last week, saying China had beaten the United States on trade but “that doesn’t make them an enemy. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm by John Elwood
(Wait – why do people tune in?) [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 8:34 am by Ben
Imagine if Russia doesn’t like what people are saying about Putin. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 8:10 am by Ronald Mann
Perhaps a week with only two cases on the argument calendar gave the justices more time to prepare than normal. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Our website KennethVercammen.com provides information on traffic offenses of which we can be retained to represent people. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
’” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost weighs in on last week’s oral argument in on Ayestas v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 11:24 am by Ben
 Last week, Motherboard discovered that one of Google's machine learning algorithms was biased against certain racial and religious groups, as well as LGBT people. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 1:02 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Tessa] Significant News A big news item for me and my homelessness colleagues was announced last week, ending a court process that has taken 2 years to decide what Lord Neuberger meant by the word ‘Significantly’ in the appeal hearing for Hotak v. [read post]