Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 5681 - 5700 of 178,515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2008, 5:29 am
Because this case is likely to be Exhibit A by any plaintiff's attorney as to the "going rate" that experienced plaintiff's attorneys are charging for their services. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
The jury had found that this defendant's negligence was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiffs' damages; defendant's motion for JNOV had been denied by the trial court. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:52 pm by Allan Blutstein
.) -- denying plaintiffs motion for reconsideration of interlocutory order in government’s favor regarding plaintiffs request for his and his family’s tax records, noting that plaintiff failed to meet Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b)’s “as justice requires” standard. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:50 am by The Docket Navigator
Plaintiff's motion for a permanent injunction following a jury verdict of infringement was denied because plaintiff failed to establish that the infringing activity irreparably harmed plaintiff's business. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:29 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That severs any causal link between Waterman's allegedly biased investigation and plaintiff's termination. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
With the adjustments to reflect Judge Ungaro’s April 25 ruling, the scoreboard now stands at Plaintiffs 6, Defendants 5. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:27 am by The Docket Navigator
The court denied defendants' motion to preclude the testimony of plaintiff's damages expert on the issue of a reasonable royalty even though the expert's royalty exceeded defendant's profits and, in some cases, the selling price of the accused products. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 12:39 pm
 The trial focused on the Plaintiffs injuries and their value. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 6:48 am by Docket Navigator
"[Plaintiff's damages expert] considered [an industry expert's] opinion on the desirability of [plaintiff's] patented features and reduced [defendant's] total revenue by 50% to account for a 'conservative calculation' of the 'but-for' revenue allegedly 'enabled' by [plaintiff's] patents. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
 »       Related StoriesCourt Grants Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs Use of Spoliation Evidence: eDiscovery Case LawCourt Denies Plaintiffs Motion to Compel the Defendant to Assist with Access to its Data: eDiscovery Case LawCourt Denies Plaintiffs Request for In Camera Review of Defendants’ Privileged Emails: eDiscovery Case Law  [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 5:40 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   The Plaintiff main contention was that the Defendant’s admission that he failed to brake to avoid the Plaintiffs vehicle constituted negligence per se. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 3:39 am by Sean Wajert
"  Reference to the other identical cases was, the court thought, akin to defendant "consolidating" the cases; by excluding cases in which the claims were consolidated on a defendant’s motion, Congress appears to have contemplated that some cases which could have been brought as a mass action would, because of the way in which the plaintiffs chose to structure their claims, remain outside of CAFA’s grant of jurisdiction. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 3:38 pm
  Plaintiffs' counsel, Roxanne Conlin, had alleged that Microsoft's market dominance prevented other software companies from developing products that competed with Microsoft's web browser Internet Explorer and other Microsoft products. [read post]