Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 5681 - 5700
of 55,815
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2011, 2:38 pm
Burns v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:50 pm
The 2009 case of Pape v Commissioner of Taxation by High Court of Australia noted significant limits on this taxation power. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 9:35 am
–UMG v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:57 am
Two different and conflicting sets of regulations – neither of which is currently in effect – were at issue in the case, known as West Virginia v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 8:10 am
While she continues to oppose enforcement of most substantive limits on federal power, she now endorses “second-order policing of federal-state bargaining,” such as Chief Justice John Roberts’ ruling in NFIB v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:34 am
See Munaf v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:25 am
Cir. cases analyzing Bilski v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:25 pm
SFFA v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
Wade but also Griswold v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:09 am
In Rost v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In caselaw, lawyers and historians can rely on new historical evidence to challenge previous rulings, as the Organization for Americans Historians did in Obergefell v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 7:51 am
Perhaps one of the most important eminent domain cases in recent years was Kelo v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 11:03 pm
New York Supreme Court: Smith v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:38 pm
Stern v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 2:39 pm
The Supreme Court’s Answer The California Supreme Court rejected both approaches in favor of a middle-ground approach in Pico Neighborhood Ass’n v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 8:01 am
Introduction The judgment in R (on the application of KBR Inc) v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2018] EWHC 2012 (Admin) came out on Thursday, 6 September 2018. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:39 pm
[For the first time, the 6-3 conservative majority powered a hard-right change in the law.] [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 11:47 am
Mancia v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:23 am
The Care One Case The above facts are drawn from a not-for-publication opinion handed down last month by a three-judge panel of the New Jersey Appellate Division — that state’s intermediate appellate court — in a case captioned Care One, LLC, et al. v Adina Straus and Jeffrey Rubin. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 6:38 pm
The case does not implicate New York Times v. [read post]
