Search for: "SESSIONS v. STATE" Results 5681 - 5700 of 6,578
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
Florida and United States v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:00 am by Ted Tjaden
The public trust doctrine has not been widely discussed in Canadian case law with the only significant mention being by the Supreme Court of Canada in British Columbia v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:00 pm by Rosalind English
The problem was that the circumstances upon which the Secretary of State relied, to support his submission that there was no real risk, were circumstances which could only be considered in closed session and set out in closed judgment. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:41 am by Russ Bensing
Oregon implicitly overruled State v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 1:15 pm by Christina D. Frangiosa
This confirmation is particularly interesting because Judge Chin currently presides over the Google Book Settlement case (Author's Guild v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
For more on this topic, see our series on conflict resolution in health care here (Part I, II, III, IV, and V). [read post]
6 May 2010, 5:00 am by Monique Altheim
Some of the suggestions were: .The role of the CPO in the US v the EU .The differences in approach in the public v the private sector .Data Security .The human flesh search phenomenon in China .The inclusion of Generation Y and their point of view on Privacy issues. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
  In its very first session in 1946, the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution 59(I), stating, “Freedom of information is a fundamental human right and … the touchstone of all the freedoms to which the United Nations is consecrated. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:38 pm by INFORRM
This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises”. [read post]