Search for: "Sayed v. Page"
Results 5681 - 5700
of 12,185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
What Professor Gluck omits is what else Justice Scalia has to say in the same opinion just a few pages later: An agency has no power to “tailor” legislation to bureaucratic policy goals by rewriting unambiguous statutory terms. . . . [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:59 am
Drake v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 12:11 pm
Maxtone-Graham v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 12:11 pm
Maxtone-Graham v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Sep. 29, 2014); Tyree v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 9:18 pm
I may not always agree with the result, but I can at least understand the reasoning.But in a recent ruling from Iowa Court of Appeals (Mohr v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
See Zerbst v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:20 am
Yesterday, the Business Court entered an important Order, titled "Order Regarding Notice of Designation and Assignment," in Southern Fastening Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
After dutifully arguing for four pages that he was bound by the ancient one-line decision from the Supreme Court in Baker v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:27 am
They requested access to the Facebook page and initially requested that she “close the page”. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:10 am
In T.E. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:36 am
From United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:24 pm
If you’re not interested in long leasehold law (which, looking at the site stats for most popular pages, is most of you), then look away now. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:03 pm
On the Rasta Rock Facebook page, they link to the dead URL, and their channel page doesn't list the reinstated video. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 5:28 am
He starts with a quote from the beloved Nino Scalia: Justice Scalia on the rule of lenity in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 7:45 pm
It’s a short opinion, just five pages, so it’s a quick read. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 12:17 pm
In Austin v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 7:06 am
It is difficult to say. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:46 am
The lower court also erred in dismissing her procedural due process claim; she had a property interest in her job based on an employment agreement specifying starting and ending dates for her teaching responsibilities (Meade v Moraine Valley Community College, October 30, 2014, Wood, D). [read post]
