Search for: "Smith v Smith" Results 5681 - 5700 of 14,494
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2009, 1:32 am
" The Court explained thatthat there is clear and convincing evidence of special circumstances to warrant a downward departure from the presumptive risk level (see People v Weatherley, 41 AD3d 1238; see also People v Smith, 30 AD3d 1070). [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Sapienza v Becker & Poliakoff  2019 NY Slip Op 05218 Decided on June 27, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department is an example: “Plaintiff’s fraud claim was properly dismissed, as plaintiff did not allege “actual pecuniary loss sustained” by plaintiff’s decedent individually “as the direct result of” defendants’ alleged fraud (Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney, 88 NY2d 413, 421 [1996] [internal… [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Sapienza v Becker & Poliakoff  2019 NY Slip Op 05218 Decided on June 27, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department is an example: “Plaintiff’s fraud claim was properly dismissed, as plaintiff did not allege “actual pecuniary loss sustained” by plaintiff’s decedent individually “as the direct result of” defendants’ alleged fraud (Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney, 88 NY2d 413, 421 [1996] [internal… [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 12:10 am
Abdallah, 51 AD3d 590 [2008]; Smith v. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 7:56 am by Eric Goldman
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:06 am by Ross Runkel
When the Court granted certiorari in CRST Van Expedited v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
That’s the question confronting the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, in Pappas v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:30 am by Jeff Welty
The collection of historical CSLI does not invade a cell phone user’s reasonable expectation of privacy under the third-party doctrine of Smith v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:02 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
  To calculate attorney fees, the Court of Appeals turned to the test set forth in Smith v Khouri, 481 Mich 519 (2008). [read post]