Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 5681 - 5700
of 29,294
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
House of Representatives, requiring the state needed to re-draw its election maps for both Congress and the state legislature. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 7:34 pm
My eyes opened as wide as saucers, though, when I saw "Corfield v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:14 am
The state argued, among other things, that the Supreme Court's decision earlier this year in Douglas v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:11 am
Addressing the issue for the first time, the Third Circuit concluded a state employee’s ADA and Title VII claims, standing alone, could not be asserted under Section 1983, because that would allow her to thwart Congress’s carefully crafted administrative scheme under both the ADA and Title VII, including exhaustion requirements. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:39 pm
In other sections of the Copyright Act, Congress expressly referenced the location of manufacture, and if it wanted to limit the first sale doctrine only to works manufactured in the United States, it could have easily done so. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
We also do not think that Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
The Bush v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 7:39 am
Under DOMA’s Section 2, Congress declared that no state can be required to recognize marriages performed in other states. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:38 am
In Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 10:21 am
In Abitron Austria GmbH v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:33 am
Wilderness Watch based its challenge on Congress's inclusion of South Fowl Lake (and of North Fowl Lake, to which it is connected) in the "wilderness" under the BWCAW Act. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 10:13 am
The first drawing was a New York state criminal case, People v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
Specifically, the Court detaches RFRA from cases like United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:17 am
But in 1996, Congress went even further, enacting the AEDPA, which said the habeas petition cannot be granted unless the state court trial error violated clearly-established Supreme Court precedent, was an unreasonable application of Supreme Court precedent, or was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 8:30 am
In Cellco Partnership v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
And when conflict is unavoidable, we should not come to do battle with the United States Congress armed only with a test (congruence and proportionality) that has no demonstrable basis in the text of the Constitution and cannot objectively be shown to have been met or failed. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:35 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 10:58 am
The Congress, the President, the state police, and other government officials are the players. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm
Justice Breyer dissents in Trump v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:02 am
Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley In 2013, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
