Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 5681 - 5700 of 9,597
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am by Don Cruse
Gambling machines STATE OF TEXAS v. $1,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 37 "8" LINER MACHINES, No. 12-0718 Per Curiam The Court agreed with the State that certain “eight-liner” machines qualified as gambling equipment for purposes of civil forfeiture. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:14 am by Jon Gelman
Here are some examples: http://www.canadianhealthandcaremall.com/http://www.walgreens-store.comhttp://www.c-v-s-pharmacy.com“Illegal online pharmacies put American consumers’ health at risk by selling potentially dangerous products. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 5:02 am by Eric Alexander
  The only case the court had before it from a state court in one of the four states at issue was an unpublished decision in Linnen v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:28 am by David DePaolo
Forged's attorney sent Guzman's attorney a "Rule 11" letter stating that they had agreed to submit the matter to Judge Katie Kennedy of Judicial Workplace Arbitrations. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:21 pm by Michelle Yeary
  Plaintiff originally filed his complaint in state court and it included claims against his non-diverse doctors. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:15 am by Carla N. Dorsi
Supreme Court ruled in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
United States, 12-862, which asks the Court to overrule Feres v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:25 am by Bexis
  Thanks to Jay Lefkowitz at Kirkland for letting us know of his win in Guarino v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
  The comp system has been around for years, sometimes triple-digit years in most states. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:25 pm by Cicely Wilson
State-law design-defect claims based on the adequacy of a drug’s warnings are preempted by federal law under a 2011 Supreme Court decision, PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 1:40 pm by Eric Alexander
            The decision in U.S. ex rel Paulos v. [read post]