Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 5681 - 5700
of 9,087
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2014, 6:01 pm
United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm
Only a few months after Italian Colors, the California Supreme Court got its first major chance to address the new landscape in Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 3:42 pm
Gentry reached the California Supreme Court for the first time while it was considering another arbitration case called Discover Bank v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:16 am
The Court explained: Appellants seek to induce us to reject State Street's actions by having us apply a presumption of prudence which is afforded fiduciaries when they decide to retain an employer's stock in falling markets, first articulated in Kuper v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 7:38 am
On April 2, the Court will hear argument in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:07 am
The issue in Ryan is whether it is per se unreasonable for a state not to provide an evidentiary hearing on a judicial-bias claim. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 10:29 am
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:51 am
Judge Ruben Castillo, the Chief Judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, recently declined to follow a widely publicized Illinois Appellate Court decision in which the Appellate Court held that, absent other consideration, two years of employment is required consideration for a restrictive covenant in Illinois. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:51 am
Judge Ruben Castillo, the Chief Judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, recently declined to follow a widely publicized Illinois Appellate Court decision in which the Appellate Court held that, absent other consideration, two years of employment is required consideration for a restrictive covenant in Illinois. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:51 am
Judge Ruben Castillo, the Chief Judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, recently declined to follow a widely publicized Illinois Appellate Court decision in which the Appellate Court held that, absent other consideration, two years of employment is required consideration for a restrictive covenant in Illinois. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:56 am
To be sure, he also cites one Pennsylvania case--Barium Steel Corp. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:58 am
Attorney for the District of Utah initiated the case of U.S. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:16 am
The D.C. district court reached the same conclusion; and it is on those grounds that this case will hopefully be decided on appeal. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 2:24 pm
The Court found applicable Jones v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
Neff and the state of Texas made history—and national headlines—when news broke of the all-female court. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 8:25 am
In some districts, misdemeanor defendants do not automatically receive a first appearance in district court in the day or two after arrest – their cases are simply set for the arresting officer’s next court date. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:20 pm
As this court observed in Rohm & Haas Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 9:25 am
EOG Resources, Inc., Cause No. 2011-27476, in the 11th Judicial District Court of Harris County. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:20 am
Observing that the judicial privilege is not “a license for extra-judicial defamation,” a federal district court in Pennsylvania enjoined an employee from communicating with his former employer’s customers regarding its alleged “discriminatory and abusive practices” that were “illegal, immoral, or both. [read post]
