Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 5681 - 5700
of 8,246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2010, 10:35 pm
In a case decided in 1942, United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:22 pm
Kaersvang: Marbury v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:06 am
161/10 eDate Advertising GmbH v X and Olivier Martinez et Robert Martinez v Société MGN Limited. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:51 am
Expanded Employer Liability for Discrimination Based on National Origin or Citizenship Status If enacted, Title V (§ 5105) would expand the population of potential claimants protected against citizenship status discrimination to include all noncitizens with employment authorization, including presumably employment-based nonimmigrants and holders of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs). [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:51 am
Expanded Employer Liability for Discrimination Based on National Origin or Citizenship Status If enacted, Title V (§ 5105) would expand the population of potential claimants protected against citizenship status discrimination to include all noncitizens with employment authorization, including presumably employment-based nonimmigrants and holders of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs). [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
Discussing oral argument in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:30 am
Both statutes use the plural term “holders. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
This is what Jaime tells us:Trademark trolls and trade mark hijacking in CubaThe start of negotiations and eventual opening of commercial relations between Cuba and United States is tempting some individuals to jump at the chance to register US trade marks in order to force trade mark holders to negotiate their entrance into the Cuban market. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 9:33 am
He is a patent attorney advocate and appeared in the Court of Appeal for England and Wales on Wednesday in Lantana Ltd v Registrar of Patents. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:00 pm
The EUIPO published The Baseline of Trade Secrets Litigation in the EU Member States in 2018. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:05 am
Failure of a deed to clearly specify what constitutes (or what does not constitute) “reasonable surface right privileges” in a reservation of mineral rights, for example, resulted in a dispute recently decided by the Ohio Supreme Court (in Snyder v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 1:39 pm
Graham v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:59 am
Maine Springs, LLC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:55 am
Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:24 pm
But, at least for now, the related case law in the United States is fundamentally better than in Germany, though this may be attributable in no small part to the historic happenstance of what cases were put before the courts in what sequence--and what questions for review the parties raised.Just so there is no misunderstanding: Dr. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:00 am
In holding the extreme self intoxicated offender to account, s. 33.1 does not require objective foreseeability of the risk of falling into a state of automatism, much less the risk of consequential harm. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 6:21 am
Its application states that at least 20 countries have site blocking, some with courts (the UK) and some without (Portugal). [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 10:30 am
See Gill v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 10:30 am
See Gill v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 10:30 am
See Gill v. [read post]
