Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 5681 - 5700
of 28,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2010, 6:46 am
At Concurring Opinions, Alan Chen considers whether the Roberts Court has a “First Amendment agenda,” in light of its decisions to grant cert. in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm
Indeed, Florida courts, as in Montgomery v State, State v Mason and Smith v State, have held that a nolo contendere plea with adjudication withheld is generally considered a conviction for purposes of determining a defendant's sentence for subsequent convictions. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 3:45 am
Early last year, in State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:31 pm
Olson v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:10 am
In the ongoing USMCA dispute on United States - Automotive Rules of Origin (USA-MEX-CDA-2022-31-01), in addition to their arguments that the U.S. unilateral interpretation of the USMCA Rules of Origin provisions for passenger vehicles and light trucks violates USMCA rules, Mexico and Canada have made a non-violation nullification or impairment claim. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:09 pm
Nor could it do so in light of Meyer v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 7:28 am
It also stated that light duty would only be considered based on an acceptable physician’s report, but the employee’s doctor did not recommend light duty. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 11:30 am
In Ekstrand v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am
United States, in which the Court will consider two issues relating to federal computer crimes, for this blog; I did the same for Green v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 7:38 am
In Golden v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:07 am
The Appellate Division, citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, said that "Stipulations of settlement between parties are binding contracts enforceable by the court and, as such, they are favored and 'not lightly cast aside' ... especially where, as here, the party seeking to set aside the stipulation was represented by counsel. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:06 am
Especially in light of her pro se status, those allegations were sufficient to state a claim." [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:07 am
The Appellate Division, citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, said that "Stipulations of settlement between parties are binding contracts enforceable by the court and, as such, they are favored and 'not lightly cast aside' ... especially where, as here, the party seeking to set aside the stipulation was represented by counsel. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 8:08 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:45 am
Related posts:Harris Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
He had successfully resisted an extradition order sought by the United States on the grounds that price-fixing in the UK was not illegal (Norris v United States (2008) UKHL 16, (2008) 1 AC 920). [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:41 pm
People v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 10:20 am
Unfortunately, chairing the panel meant I had to miss Cohen’s Expeditiousnesses and Delay in State Courts: An Exploration of Case Processing Time in Civil Trials, which I heard was great, and Bilz/Gold’s An Experimental Test of Civil Recourse Theory, which I know is awesome and which sheds some pretty useful light on why recourse theory might (and might not) explain private law doctrine. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:30 am
Rudd v. [read post]
