Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 5681 - 5700 of 11,370
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2014, 6:55 am by John McKiggan
But what about sexual abuse survivors who have already come forward and may have had their claims statute barred? [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 6:55 am by John McKiggan
But what about sexual abuse survivors who have already come forward and may have had their claims statute barred? [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:00 am by David Crockett
NON-FILED CLAIMS ARE BARRED If a creditor who has been properly notified does not file a timely creditors claim with the probate estate is legally barred from collecting on the debt. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:42 am
(Noah Berger/Reuters) So holds the Connecticut Supreme Court, in the just-released State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:49 am by Terry Hart
The major record labels sued Sirius XM in state court in California alleging the same. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 11:13 am
Our client was deemed totally disabled as of July 11, 2013 and awarded California State Disability Insurance benefits by the State of California’s Employment Development Department. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 3:24 am
Phillips' statements are going to be barred by California's one-year statute of limitations, so this case is going to be about the publicist's statements alone. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
The second action was filed by the CFPB against Student Loan Processing.US (a fictitious business name of Irvine Web Works, Inc.) and its individual owner in a California federal district court. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In affirming, the Court of Appeal rejected County’s arguments that the petition was time barred (because the Sierra Club sought to enforce, not challenge the adequacy of, a mitigation measure); that the CAP satisfied MM CC-1.2; and that the trial court erred in requiring a supplemental EIR. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 5:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  Incontestability is no bar to a genericity finding, but registered marks are entitled to a strong presumption of validity. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 12:00 am by David Crockett
Before the law was changed to require disclosure as it is now, the state legislature committee reviewing the proposed legislation was presented with a case of a 90-year-old man who met the “love of his life” on a bar stool and married her three months later. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 12:00 am by David Crockett
Before the law was changed to require disclosure as it is now, the state legislature committee reviewing the proposed legislation was presented with a case of a 90-year-old man who met the “love of his life” on a bar stool and married her three months later. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 12:00 am by David Crockett
Before the law was changed to require disclosure as it is now, the state legislature committee reviewing the proposed legislation was presented with a case of a 90-year-old man who met the “love of his life” on a bar stool and married her three months later. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 1:38 pm by Native American Rights Fund
(insurance, slip and fall) * State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2014state.htmlSue/perior Concrete & Paving, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 6:19 am by Jim Sedor
From the States and Municipalities: California – L.A. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Stare decisis is a rather flexible constraint in constitutional matters, whereas the Court has made clear that the bar for overruling a past decision that was construing a federal statute is particularly high (presumably because Congress can fix erroneous judicial constructions of statutes more easily than it can correct wrong-headed readings of the Constitution). [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am by John Elwood
The petition asked whether the California Supreme Court violates the First Amendment right to petition for redress of grievances by barring prisoners represented in name only from making pro se filings. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am by Ron Coleman
  And a federal court has recently agreed, because on April 10, 2014, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that A’lor is barred from infringing CHARRIOL cable trademarks by selling ALOR jewelry that uses such cable. [read post]