Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 5701 - 5720 of 9,057
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2012, 6:12 am
"Arizona Supreme Court hears Mesa tattoo case": Today's edition of The Arizona Republic contains an article that begins, "The Arizona Supreme Court is deliberating whether the First Amendment rights of tattoo artists trump a city's right to regulate them under zoning codes. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 10:25 am by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court ruling in which undocumented immigrants must be released after six months if their country of origin will not allow their return. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:52 am
"A quarter century ago," ScotusBlog's Lyle Denniston wrote last Monday, "the Supreme Court ruled that it would be unconstitutional to execute a legally insane individual in Ford v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:21 am by Sam Favate
Following Arizona’s strict immigration law – which will be the subject of Supreme Court hearing later this year – Georgia passed a similar law in 2011, giving wide powers to police to investigate the immigration status of undocumented immigrants. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:12 am by nflatow
  Based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Coleman v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:46 am by Kent Scheidegger
The US Supreme Court's Monday orders list is here. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:20 am by Rekha Arulanantham
Oral arguments in that case will take place in the Supreme Court on April 25. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 4:15 pm by Albert Wan
  In fact, the  attorneys in the Chaidez matter — the case before the Supreme Court which presents the issue of Padilla retroactivity — are still briefing the issue of whether the Supreme Court should grant cert. in that case. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm by Pace Law School Library
Stevens confounds a century of Supreme Court conventionalism and redefines the limits of “entertainment. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:24 pm by Michael O'Hear
  Indeed, the Supreme Court had indicated as much in Coleman v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:36 pm by Suzanne Ito
" As the Supreme Court prepares to hear argument on the constitutionality of S.B. 1070 on April 25, this decision is a timely reminder that, while there are many technical legal steps along the way, courts can and should focus on what everyone knows is really at stake here: whether states and cities will be allowed to legislate discrimination, and whether they will be allowed to enact their own local immigration laws and policies. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:07 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Ryan case out of Arizona, which could expand appeals access for inmates. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 5:11 am by Gustavo Arballo
 Barrett Lain termina diciendo: "The stark reality is that the Supreme Court is unlikely to save us from tyranny of the majority unless we are already saving ourselves". [read post]