Search for: "COOPER V. COOPER"
Results 5701 - 5720
of 11,638
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2014, 6:33 am
Part V considers balancing marine environmental protection and freedom of navigation. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:50 am
The Indiana Court of Appeals recently interpreted a land developer’s contract with an Indiana town in Carroll Creek Development Company Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 11:50 pm
The Indiana Court of Appeals recently interpreted a land developer’s contract with an Indiana town in Carroll Creek Development Company Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:25 am
Board of Ed. (3d Cir. 1990) rejected a constitutional challenge to the statute; Cooper v. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 10:59 pm
Huawei; Invista Sarl v. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:56 am
: 3-15544Case filed: September 30, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: October 2, 2014 11/26/2014 02/24/2015 2014-134 SEC v. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 7:01 am
R.A.V. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:04 am
" as Bot smacks challenge to unitary patentIn 2013 Spain initiated proceedings before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), challenging the validity of Regulation 1257/2012 -- which implements enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Cooper in his October 22, 2014 decision in Joseph M. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Madison,[1]5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)· Cooper v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 2:01 pm
In Katz v Siroty, the defendant appealed an order denying his motion to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Westchester County. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 9:01 am
In Katz v Siroty, the defendant appealed an order denying his motion to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Westchester County. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 9:16 am
People v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
We have defined the term “exclusively” as used in this context “to connote ‘principal’ or ‘primary,’ such that purposes and uses merely ‘auxiliary or incidental to the main and exempt purpose’ and use will not defeat the exemption’” (Matter of Yeshivath Shearith Hapletah v Assessor of Town of Fallsburg, 79 NY2d 244, 249 [1992], quoting Matter of Association of Bar of City of N.Y. v Lewisohn, 34 NY2d 143, 153 [1974]).… [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:06 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 6:00 am
She did not understand the references to an HR policy and thought that she was being accused of not being cooperative at work. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:31 pm
” There is hope that the tide can be turned through an influx of guns and money, but success is also likely to require a demonstrated track record of defeating ISIS, dislodging them from their positions, and defending towns and cities that cooperate in the coalition’s campaign. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 10:09 am
While a refusal to cooperate with law enforcement officers during a consensual encounter, standing alone, can’t support a stop, Florida v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 6:46 am
They were also distinguishable from Bryson v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:57 am
Cases C-146/13 and C-147/13 Kingdom of Spain v European Parliament and Council of the European Union have now both reached the point at which Advocate General Bot has published his Opinion, which means that all that is left now is for the CJEU to determine whether it will follow his guidance (as happens around 80 per cent of the time) or articulate its own reasoning. [read post]
