Search for: "DOE 5" Results 5701 - 5720 of 84,762
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2014, 5:36 am
In particular a parody does not have to be original. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:46 pm by Michael Madison
But does it have to follow that the experience of our sister professions doesn’t hold directly applicable lessons for us? [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 8:56 am by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2014), the Federal Circuit explained that prosecution surrender does apply in design patent cases. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 12:32 pm by Craig R. Tractenberg
Unlike the previous Chapter 11, the Subchapter 5 bankruptcy does not require voting on a plan of reorganization. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 12:13 pm
Powell does not militate that Burris can not be excluded based on Article 1, Section 5. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:08 pm by Howard Friedman
Four of the Court's 9 Justices recused themselves in the case, and two lower appellate court judges were appointed to sit with the remaining 5 regular Justices to hear the case. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 5:42 am by Dennis Crouch
If the applicant does not follow-up with these next steps, the provisional application is abandoned, and the file kept secret. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:57 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Meanwhile, in late February 2010, Lannett submitted its own NDA (NDA No. 201517) to FDA for Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution, 100 mg per 5 mL (20 mg per mL), which NDA was not granted a 6-month priority review as was Roxane’s NDA. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 3:24 am
Does Seagate's entry into the e-discovery market make any sense? [read post]
29 May 2007, 6:32 am
Here are the opinion; stories from the WSJ, WaPo and NYT; and an overview of the court’s recent 5-4 splits. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:17 am by Joy Waltemath
If plaintiffs prefer state court and allege that the amount in controversy does not exceed $5 million, a defendant must “put forward evidence showing that the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million, to satisfy other requirements of CAFA, and to persuade the court that the estimate of damages in controversy is a reasonable one. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 6:02 am by Derek T. Muller
But because it does not disclose its methodology, I am awaiting an answer on how it does weigh them. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 2:40 am
” [51]Also known as 'three-step test'Streaming of unlicensed contentThe next, topical, issue to address was whether the streaming of unlicensed content could result in liability infringement of the right of reproduction or could be, instead, excused under the exemption for temporary copies within Article 5(1) of the InfoSoc Directive.As readers know, the exemption within Article 5(1) is subject to five cumulativeconditions that must be interpreted strictly:… [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 6:11 pm by Jamie Markham
Does it matter which individual sentence gets the credit? [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 6:11 pm by Jamie Markham
Does it matter which individual sentence gets the credit? [read post]