Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 5701 - 5720 of 7,403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2011, 1:52 pm
The new Chrometa (sorry, I’ve got nothing else; let’s just hope that the new Chrometa does not go the way of the new Coke) web app is now available wherever you have an internet connection, and, as such, is device independent. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 8:45 pm
I doubted their story then but now I have to admit I could have been wrong in light of recent stories that the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles have been imposing the so-called condition "X" on prospective parolees for years without factual or legal basis. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:26 am by admin
“Until he does, we’re not going to have anything to say about a project that does not e [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:02 am by Richard Hunt
As I noted in my last blog, the opposite result was reached in Castillo v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:42 am
 “I’ll give you half a degree z-decades from now and you give me $x-billions-today”? [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 2:18 am by Jelle Hoekstra
Accordingly, the subject-matter of claim 1 could not be directly and unambiguously derived from B29.X. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Q: when does the fact that the alleged infringement is occuring become known? [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But I didn’t hear ignorance; I heard Justices seeking to write an opinion reversing the Federal Circuit limited to TM law and asking for guidance on how to do so. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Speech beyond “I will sell you X good at Y price” can be commercial, depending on the circumstances. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:01 am by tekEditor
To express that view as a simple equation, we can write: O = X/Y * t Where O is total output, X is the given output during a benchmark number of hours, designated by Y, and t is the actual number of hours worked. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:20 am
Does that mean the VCs were foolish to invest in Delicious? [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article X(5) provides explicitly that discharge from custody pursuant to Article X(4) shall not prevent subsequent rearrest and extradition upon later delivery of the extradition request and supporting documents. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:26 pm by thelawprofessor
” Since an owned vBulletin license does not “expire” and the licensee could continue to run the forum software (but not receive updates), then a customer who owned a license to the software, by definition, still has an “active license” that is “effective until terminated. [read post]