Search for: "Does 1-30" Results 5701 - 5720 of 27,614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2012, 11:07 am
Clair County case, our client received a minimum sentence on a drunk driving felony (1 year probation and 30 days in jail). [read post]
11 May 2013, 10:06 pm by Old Fox
Sharia does not require a majority vote. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 6:05 am by Hal Scott, Harvard Law School,
Volcker is the Chairman of the Trustees as well as the Chairman of the Steering Committee of the Group of 30 (G-30), it is worth noting that the Volcker Rules are significantly more aggressive than the G-30’s recent proposal to merely limit proprietary trading by “strict capital and liquidity requirements. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:22 pm by WIMS
    DOE's total anticipated financial contribution for the project is $1.073 billion, $1 billion of which would come from Recovery Act (ARRA) funds for CCS research. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As this value covers the range from 30 to 60 ml/100g, it still overlaps to a large extent with that of the Wessalith P used in document D2 […]. [2.9] For all these reasons, the Board concludes that the subject-matter of Claim 1 of the main request and the first auxiliary request is not novel in view of Example H of D2 (A 54). [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 3:02 pm by Armand Grinstajn
However, the examining division is of the opinion that claim 1 of the parent application as granted did not contain any nonessential features, and that each of the features that have now been omitted is in fact indispensable for claim 1 to satisfy the requirements of Articles 76(1), 84 and 52(1) EPC. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
But if a state wants to ban viewpoint discrimination by platforms, § 230(c)(2) does not preempt that choice. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:26 am by Diane Tweedlie
The wording of the claims is not relevant for the present decision and is not reproduced here.Reasons for the DecisionPriority right (Article 87(1) EPC)1. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 7:40 pm by J. Yackley
For injuries that occurred between October 1, 1995 and September 30, 2008, TTD benefits are available for up to 104 weeks. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:27 am by Lisa Gelman
 The breakdown can be based on three (3) reasons: 1) Separation from the other party for a period of one (1) year, 2) Adultery, 3) Cruelty. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:27 am by Lisa Gelman
 The breakdown can be based on three (3) reasons: 1) Separation from the other party for a period of one (1) year, 2) Adultery, 3) Cruelty. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 10:28 am by Tung Yin
 Anyway, seeing the relatively smaller Pacific Northwest cities and San Jose atop the list does make some sense to me! [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 9:51 pm by Simon Gibbs
Here are the amendments, coming into force on 1st October 2011: (1) In paragraph 1.1(1), for “1 October 2009 to 30 September 2011” substitute “1 October 2011 to 30 September 2012” [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:37 am
” Noting that: “• Tier 1 benefits are available to all employees hired before June 30, 1973;“• Tier 2 covers all employees hired on or after June 30, 1973 and before July 27,1976; “• Tier 3 covers employees hired on or after July 27, 1976, and before Sept. 1, 1983; “• Tier 4 includes all employees hired on or after Sept. 1, 1983, and before Jan. 1, 2010; and “• Tier 5 covers employees… [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:34 am by Michael O'Hear
 I doubt it’s a game-changer, but the report does include a wealth of interesting new data. [read post]
18 May 2007, 3:45 pm
Further, the evidence does not establish that the Employer is a seasonal employer. [read post]