Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 5701 - 5720
of 6,584
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2023, 7:02 am
The court granted a motion to dismiss on lack of likely confusion. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am
The PRA also addresses the constitutional concerns discussed by the Supreme Court in Nixon v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 11:54 am
Quebec Court of Appeal rejects BC Court of Appeal passing-on defence decisions in Pro-Sys and Sun-Rype The Quebec Court of Appeal unanimously overturned the earlier 2008 Quebec Superior Court decision in Option Consommateurs v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:12 am
Quebec Court of Appeal rejects BC Court of Appeal passing-on defence decisions in Pro-Sys and Sun-Rype The Quebec Court of Appeal unanimously overturned the earlier 2008 Quebec Superior Court decision in Option Consommateurs v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 10:04 am
Koch v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 4:17 pm
European Court of Human RightsGawlik v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 10:19 am
Superior Court, a controversial California Supreme Court decision that upended the existing legal standards applied in determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 11:00 am
Superior Court. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
The district court granted certification in part and denied it in part. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 10:12 pm
In granting the application the Court noted as follows: [12] The defendant submits that although Rule 7-6 (1)-(3) makes no specific provision for a person other than the party to be examined to attend and answer questions, Wong (guardian ad litem) v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 9:49 am
The case, MacKinnon v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:57 pm
In arriving at this conclusion, the court applied the principles stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Commonwealth Construction Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 21 to 23 May 2018 Warby J heard an application for permission to serve a representative action out of the jurisdiction in the case of Lloyd v Google. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:24 am
The ARB agreed with the ALJ’s observation that that “other than asserting six years has passed since the case was filed, reminding the Court of its superior work product, and citing distinguishable cases that preceded the Purdue [sic] Court’s decision, Counsel has done nothing to justify the enhancement. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 8:50 pm
More recently though, the Court stated in 2014 in Tsilhqot’in Nation v. [read post]
