Search for: "JOHNSON v. THE STATE"
Results 5701 - 5720
of 8,030
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2011, 8:06 am
The Court explained that"Although the contention of defendant that his plea was not knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered survives his valid waiver of the right to appeal, defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review by failing to move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction on the ground[] now raised" (People v VanDeViver, 56 AD3d 1118, 1118, lv denied 11 NY3d 931, 12 NY3d 788; see People v McKeon, 78 AD3d 1617, 1618; People… [read post]
7 May 2011, 1:25 pm
Did DePuy Orthopaedics, subsidiary of New Jersey-based Johnson & Johnson, knowingly sell defective hip implant devices? [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:27 pm
General Court Marshal Convening Authority (sic) Johnson v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:37 am
Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989) or United States v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 7:36 pm
by Daniel RichardsonState v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:23 pm
Keating, the Supreme Court held the FAA applies to state courts and is intended to preempt state anti-arbitration laws to the contrary, and in Circuit City Stores, Inc., v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:06 pm
’ ” Stevens’ thoughts no doubt reminded some observers of his dissent in the 1989 case, Johnson v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 11:35 am
MinihanFailure to instruct on voluntary intoxicationImproper comment about "mug shot"State v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 4:30 am
Johnson v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:12 pm
The court affirmed the rejection of a defamation counterclaim based on PBM’s press release stating: “Mead Johnson Lies About Baby Formula . . . [read post]
3 May 2011, 6:20 am
In Johnson-Graham-Malone, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:49 pm
Professor Rebecca Tsosie Part 2: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States, New Zealand, and Beyond View presentation here Johnson v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:09 pm
Johnson, 2011 U.S. [read post]
1 May 2011, 6:14 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:28 am
AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:50 am
Under the 9th Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 9:01 am
There's been a lot of analysis of the disastrous impact of the Supreme Court's 5 to 4 Concepcion v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 9:01 am
There's been a lot of analysis of the disastrous impact of the Supreme Court's 5 to 4 Concepcion v. [read post]
