Search for: "LEAD CLASS PLAINTIFFS" Results 5701 - 5720 of 6,557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2020, 8:56 am by Kristian Soltes
The plaintiffs asked the judge to sign an order making Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP and Mehri & Skalet PLLC the settlement class counsel, should the deal be approved. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
  (a) Because SFFA complies with the standing requirements for or- ganizational plaintiffs articulated by this Court in Hunt v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
  (a) Because SFFA complies with the standing requirements for or- ganizational plaintiffs articulated by this Court in Hunt v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
: (Spicy IP),‘The Good, the Bad and the Ugly II’ – Business, public interest forces and the role of IP: (IP finance),Interview with Debra Harry, Indigenous People’s Council on Biocolonialism: (Intellectual Property Watch),WIPO Committee on Development and IP wraps up inaugural meeting: (WIPO),Five IP policy questions for WIPO DG Candidates: (Intellectual Property Watch),IP strategy for R&D: keep records like Thomas Edison: (Lightbulb),New kid on the… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:14 am
While the rulings may prove a major hurdle, lawyers for many plaintiffs say their legal efforts may just be starting. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
Samsonite Europe (EPLAW) New Zealand Designs amendment regulations now promulgated (Class 99) Poland Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw rules that the mark 60 R-156991 is not sufficiently distinctive in standard business transactions (Class 46) L’OREAL not confusingly similar to O’LEARY? [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 6:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the law, as in life, that attitude can lead to ethical shortcuts. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(Patent Prospector) US-Korea adopt patent prosecution highway (Law360) (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property)    Global Global - General Obama, patent reform, patent litigation in the USA and Europe – IP Think Tank podcast 26 January 2009 (IP Think Tank) Intangible values collapse – the old 70% to 80% claim is now officially dead and buried (IAM) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Managing value in a shrinking economy: the IP audit (IP Frontline) Downturn… [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 3:37 am by INFORRM
(That in turn would lead to new concerns about Article 15, and about the fundamental rights and competition issues discussed below.) [read post]
It suffices to prove that a reasonable person subjected to the discriminatory conduct would find, as the plaintiff did, that the harassment so altered working conditions as to make it more difficult to do the job. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
For me, college years were about classes, studying, and making money in the music business. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:16 am
  Another of the Trilogy (Harden) vacated and remanded a decision denying certification of a nationwide class of various TPP claims, 712 F.3d at 70, thus raising the specter of even more massive litigation of a sort not permitted by any other federal Court of Appeals. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:13 pm by David Kopel
A new lawsuit resulted, among whose plaintiffs were Mr. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
The court says: The Commercial is an obvious farce that would not lead anyone to believe that Martin, or anyone else, had actually accomplished all of the remarkable feats described. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Clayton County—concludes that class certification is improper: one of the plaintiffs lacks standing because it is statutorily exempt from Title VII, and the other is indeed entitled to an exemption under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:22 pm
Cal. 2000), the court again found electronic trespass to chattels against the defendant, an on-line auction company, citing Thrifty: “In order to prevail on a claim for trespass based on accessing a computer system, the plaintiff must establish: (1) defendant intentionally and without authorization interfered with plaintiff's possessory interest in the computer system; and (2) defendant's unauthorized use proximately resulted in damage to plaintiff. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:19 pm by John Ross
"We understand [the plaintiff's] frustration" is not the kind of thing that plaintiffs like to hear from a court. [read post]