Search for: "Labelle v. State" Results 5701 - 5720 of 8,026
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm by legalinformatics
Voice Given to Labels and Rights in Coverage of Arizona’s Immigration Reform Legislation. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm
US law has also protected geographic indications through common law trade mark law without need for a registration ( the "Cognac" case - Institut National Des Appellations v Brown-Forman Corp (TTAB 1998)).However, when it comes to produce and products which are of such strong cultural and heritage state significance like the New Mexico chile, it is the state's government that usually applies for a certification mark. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:00 am by Jack Sharman
  Grand jury subpoenas, unlike trial subpoenas, may be served nationwide:  there are geographical limitations within the United States. [read post]
6 May 2010, 1:12 pm by Erik Gerding
Assume that tomorrow someone from ACA publicly stated “Whoops! [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:52 am
  Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695, 710-11 (D.C. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 12:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  States could require labeling, but could not prohibit the copying itself on the theory that mere copying was deceptive. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:12 pm
In this case courts will usually undertake an “economic realities” test, which considers five factors articulated in the Supreme Court’s 1947 decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Perez, et al., and case 11-714 is titled Perry, et al., v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
We've already posted a couple of times about the Thorogood v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:01 am by Margaret Sachs
    The Supreme Court yesterday issued its decision in Morrison v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:48 am by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the government of Argentina in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 10:35 pm by Florian Mueller
Reed argued that small app developers would benefit from antitrust enforcement is the licensing and enforcement of standard-essential patents (SEPs), specifically mentioning the FTC v. [read post]