Search for: "M. B.1." Results 5701 - 5720 of 13,697
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2015, 6:00 am by Samuel Cutler
To which Szubin responded, “I’m not aware of any discussions within the administration that would lead to our snapback leverage being dissipated…at any point. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:42 am by Gene Killian
The time it takes to resolve a cyberattack has increased by nearly 130% during the same time period, with the average cost incurred to resolve a single attack totaling more than $1 million. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:03 am by Joe Koncelik
Carroll County Board of Revision, BTA Case No. 94-M-454 (April 19, 1996); Hufford v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 3:27 pm
So I'm not really sure that there was no "jurisdiction" to make these findings. [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:41 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(I’m working on a paper with Chris Buccafusco now about this problem in music copyright cases.) [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 10:47 am by Mark Tushnet
It's been a while since I commented on "developments" (and the like) in legal scholarship, but reading a couple of things over the past two days provoked me.1. [read post]
24 May 2016, 8:16 am by Gritsforbreakfast
People age 55 or older accounted for 1 percent of state prison admissions in 1993, 2 percent in 2003 and 4 percent in 2013. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 7:29 pm
There is no cause of action for failing to disclose an affiliation or connection (setting aside possible false advertising claims under §43(a)(1)(B), which the Court left available in Dastar - though see below). [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 10:31 am by Andy Weisbecker
    Your firm failed to maintain equipment in an acceptable condition through appropriate cleaning and sanitizing as required by 21 CFR 110.80(b)(1). [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:05 am
The student remains in F-1 status throughout the OPT period. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 6:33 am by MBettman
OAC 5101:2-42-09(B)(1) (Sets forth obligations of public or private agency at least seventy-two hours prior to the execution of a permanent surrender agreement.) [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
” Thus, can be avoided, the expense and time required by: (1) the opponent’s having to prepare and present arguments justifying a court order for access to the system that produced the evidence; (2) overcoming the objections of the owner/operator of the technology as to: (a) violations of the confidentiality of business information, including that of thousands of customers, clients, or patients; (b) protecting intellectual property privacy; and, (c) the expense and time… [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:48 am by Susan Brenner
Thus, we conclude that Detective Widner validly authenticated the exhibits pursuant to the requirements of Indiana Evidence Rule 901(b)(1). [read post]