Search for: "Matter of Robert T" Results 5701 - 5720 of 10,571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2019, 9:09 am by David Priess
More recently, during the July 24 public testimony of Robert Mueller, Ratcliffe stood out due to his full-throated criticisms of the former special counsel’s office, its investigation, and its findings. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:02 pm by Amy Howe
And with the 2020 census looming, no matter what happens in this case, there will almost certainly be yet another map on the horizon. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
Nor would it matter that Title VII requires consideration of race on a wholesale, rather than retail, level. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:15 pm by Lyle Denniston
  He said, for example, that this was a matter of law, and he indicated he meant state law. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 11:14 am
It could be (as has happened in Chief Justice Roberts’s case) that his old law firm was involved in the matter and he was at the firm and involved directly or indirectly, or it could be that a Justice has seen a case already on the lower court he was elevated from and doesn’t believe he should get two bites at the apple, so to speak. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 2:41 pm
That was the whole purpose of it, wasn't it? [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
The most significant decision was that of the Constitutional Court in April, in the case of Robert Mcbride v The Citizen ([2011] ZACC 11)(see the Inforrm post). [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:08 am by Sean Wajert
Roberts and Justice Kagan then asked about component parts makers. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am by Erin Miller
  According to a recent FOX News poll, seventy percent of voters indicate that it would not matter to them if there were no Justice with a Protestant background. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
  According to the same post on The Oval blog, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs says the president is “getting closer” to a nomination (though “ABC’s Jake Tapper couldn’t help but ask: Isn’t that just a matter of ‘chronological fact? [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:06 am
Lincoln's T-Mails: The Untold Story of How Abraham Lincoln Used the Telegraph To Win the Civil War. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:34 pm by Rory Little
The argument had still not focused explicitly on what the statutory term “obtained” in Section 853(a) does or doesn’t mean. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
—that war will be averted and the missiles withdrawn, it really doesn’t matter because Sherwin puts the reader so completely within the moment. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm by Jim Hassett
” – Robert Crandall In many law firms, assembling a team for a large matter can be an interesting exercise these days, especially if the firm is filled with lawyers who do not have enough billable work to meet their quotas. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But what this summary ignores is that the majority opinion by Chief Justice Roberts didn’t just reject the dissenters’ reading of the Obamacare statute. [read post]