Search for: "Office of Hearing and Appeals" Results 5701 - 5720 of 23,874
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the following cases for the upcoming term. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:20 am by Jonathan Holbrook
After conducting a hearing on the MAR, the trial court found that the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel and ordered the convictions vacated. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 2:02 pm by Jason Rantanen
It is therefore crucial to address the question raised at a recent Hearing before the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property: how can the quality of US patents be ensured? [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 10:38 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Grits may delve more deeply into this soon, but for now, here's the link.Bail litigation roundupSee a write-up from The Appeal of recent bail-litigation news, including from Houston and Galveston. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:32 am by Carolina Attorneys
She further testified that as the office manager she made $2,888.58 a month, about one thousand dollars more than what Defendant reported to make in his 2017 amended income tax return, which was amended a couple weeks before the hearing on Plaintiff’s motion to modify child support. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am by Carolina Attorneys
Officers found Defendant hiding under a nearby automobile and arrested him. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 8:43 am by Gritsforbreakfast
He blamed Dallas judges who appealed the federal injunction for blocking the move, although at least one judge supports the idea. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:15 am by Ronald Mann
This case involves the procedures for challenging the denial of a patent by the Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:47 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
They both testified that when they went to check on plaintiff after hearing the fall, he and the dog gate were on the landing. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:26 am by Diane Tweedlie
In their appeal, the appellants do not contest the finding that the priority right claimed for the present application was not valid. [read post]