Search for: "Park v State" Results 5701 - 5720 of 11,301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am by Richard Hunt
When she filed suit the City’s parking violated the requirement that accessible parking spaces be disbursed, but did have the correct number and layout of van accessible spaces. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 11:32 am by Thomas Merrill
  PPL and the United States (which has filed a brief on the merits supporting PPL) rely heavily on United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:42 pm by Brett Trout
Differentiating Prior Cases Myriad directed the court to cases allowing patents on compounds found within living organisms, such as Parke-Davis & Co. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
., the Court will hear a state case, Riley v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 6:31 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Faced with mixed jurisprudence from other jurisdictions, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal answers this question for that province in Crook v Druxbury, 2020 SKCA 43 (CanLII), rendering a decision that is harmonious with the state of the law in Alberta and British Columbia. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 3:57 pm by Allison Tussey
Defendants’ next scheduled hearing will be before the Honorable Susan Illston, United States District Court Judge, on April 18, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. , announced United States Attorney Melinda Haag, Scott O’Briant, Special Agent in Charge, Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, Leslie DeMarco, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Housing Finance Agency, Office of Inspector General, and Wade V. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:28 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Chickering (1976) 18 Cal.3d 190, the Court essentially rejected the two-step approach enunciated in Banker’s Hill, Hillcrest, Park West Community Preservation Group v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:20 am by Brooke Miller
 Together these two court rulings, issued on the same day, reinforce the primacy of CEQA in challenging development projects throughout the State. [1]  Save Berkeley’s Neighborhood v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:26 pm by moderator
Moats: Judge Jerry Smith reversed the trial court and held that the police officer lacked reasonable suspicion of criminal activity to justify pulling up behind the defendant's parked vehicle and activating her blue emergency lights.State of Tennessee v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]