Search for: "Price v. Price" Results 5701 - 5720 of 18,085
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
  Synergy Sport International, Ltd. v United States, 17 C.I.T. 18 (1993).Customs cites many difficulties with the application of the First Sale Rule as the reasons for the proposed change. [read post]
6 May 2009, 9:44 am
  Similarly, while some have suggested that the presence of price discrimination might be used to infer monopoly power, most economists now recognize that price discrimination is common in markets in which firms do not have durable, long-run monopoly power. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Nola Werren, Esq.
This concept was addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Buckley v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:40 am
While there are many good accountants, with good financial skills/tools, the Ohio Supreme Court recently held (in the case of Hilliard City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 7:55 pm
  Synergy Sport International, Ltd. v United States, 17 C.I.T. 18 (1993). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
Each of these 97 CMAs was alleged to constitute a relevant geographic market.The case is U.S. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 4:56 pm
  The Supreme Court decision, Illinois Brick v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:42 pm by Joel Zand
View the class-action complaint against Facebook, adSage, and other defendants by Krystal’s NFL Shoppe here: Class Action Complaint (Inkies Sports, Inc. d/b/a Krystal’s NFL Shoppe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 4:36 pm by Jeffrey Gross
Another potential barrier to many civil claims is the bar on claims by  “indirect purchasers” under the Supreme Court case  Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:58 pm
”The September 30 complaint in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]