Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 5701 - 5720
of 9,853
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2014, 4:37 am
Roche Molecular Sys., Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2188 (2011) (citing United States v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:17 am
The Court asked the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States last fall. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
It seems to me that the important distinction is that what is in the constitutional canon will be hard to change, and the Roberts Court majority has shown in Shelby County v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
It seems to me that the important distinction is that what is in the constitutional canon will be hard to change, and the Roberts Court majority has shown in Shelby County v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 10:41 pm
United Artists Corp. (1968) and Teleprompter Corp. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm
Ongoing litigation in United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:47 am
Although it did not come out really plainly in the argument, the Court did seem to sense that there were greater risks to cellphone privacy in the case of a modern smartphone — the kind of device involved in Riley — and a somewhat dated model, the “flip phone,” which is the device at issue in the second case Tuesday, United States v Wurie. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:24 am
Young, From World Duty Free to Metal-Tech: A Review of International Investment Treaty Arbitration Cases Involving Allegations of CorruptionBrandt J C Pasco, United States National Security Reviews of Foreign Direct Investment:: From Classified Programmes to Critical Infrastructure, This is What the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States Cares AboutJoost Pauwelyn, At the Edge of Chaos? [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:38 am
California and United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 11:19 pm
Maynard — and then suggested by the concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm
Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday of this week in Schuette v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:22 pm
Justice Kennedy, with Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito, reasoned that the principle that consideration of race in admissions is permissible when certain conditions are met was not challenged; the issue was whether, and how, state voters may choose to prohibit consideration of such racial preferences. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
” Under United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:36 am
SpiegelLegal Counsel: Jean-Paul Jassy; Robert Penchina; Thomas Curley; Kevin L. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:36 am
SpiegelLegal Counsel: Jean-Paul Jassy; Robert Penchina; Thomas Curley; Kevin L. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:36 am
SpiegelSource of Law: United StatesVerdict or Settlement Amount: N/ALegal Claims: Copyright InfringementCourt Name: United States District Court for the Central District of California, Western DivisionLegal Counsel: Jean-Paul Jassy; Robert Penchina; Thomas Curley; Kevin L. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 8:47 am
CTS shared its argument time with the United States supporting it as an amicus. [read post]
