Search for: "State v Cooper"
Results 5701 - 5720
of 8,568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2018, 3:01 am
The workers then sought out union representation; former railroad worker Eugene V. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:09 am
The case before the Supreme Court, Murray v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:16 am
A Case Comment on Gold Reserve v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:33 am
Does Article 27 of the TRIPS Agreement setting out the framework for patent protection fall within a field for which the Member States continue to have primary competence and, if so, can the Member States themselves accord direct effect to that provision, and can the national court apply it directly subject to the requirements laid down by national law? [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 2:36 am
OR STATE GOVERNMENT WORKS [read post]
29 May 2012, 12:09 pm
The case is USA v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:47 pm
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 11:27 am
Some state courts have reached the same conclusion. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am
Last Friday, the Solicitor General filed a self-described “Petition for a Writ of Certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 8:46 am
D.K.D. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 12:55 pm
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY - FIRE LOSS - MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATION IN APPLICATION - RESCISSION - WAIVER - ESTOPPEL - TIMELINESS OF DENIAL Precision Auto Accessories, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 11:19 am
Amdocs v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Perhaps it should be called the Littman Effect, after the First Department's 2008 decision in Littman v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
While article L. 113-2 of the French Intellectual Property (IP) Code defines “composite work” as a “work in which a pre-existing work is incorporated without the cooperation of the author of the latter,” article L. 113-4 merely states that such work “is the property of the author who made it, subject to the rights of the author of the original work” but not explain its rationale further. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 5:01 am
Léon Mugesera v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
State Water Resources Control Board (2017) 15 Cal.App.5th 991; see 10/11/17 post. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 2:32 am
Your cooperation is appreciated. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 4:54 am
I am disappointed that The News published, as a news article, the opinions of John V. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 8:44 am
In People v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 7:03 am
The employer’s motion for summary judgment was denied in part and granted in part (Norman v Bright Horizons Family Solutions, LLC, January 23, 2014, Kovachevich, E). [read post]
