Search for: "State v. Downs"
Results 5701 - 5720
of 40,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2021, 11:43 am
The plaintiff also states that he made a pre-suit demand before the special meeting date was established, but due to the board’s interestedness—all five members allegedly are executives of, or hold a direct or indirect interest in, the sponsor—the board scheduled the vote anyway "to cram down the [amendments] and secure the sponsor’s payday. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 10:00 am
”); Two-Way Media LLC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:26 am
The en banc ruling produced passionate dissenting opinions from three Circuit judges, one of whom suggested the search was actually motivated.The case is United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:20 pm
The case of Hale v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:20 pm
The case of Hale v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 4:18 pm
”] From Yukutake v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 2:35 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 8:19 am
Summer is winding down but several Indiana trademark and copyright lawsuits are just heating up. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 6:32 pm
” Locasto v. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 3:06 pm
This, as political scientists and historians are taught in graduate school, is a major controversy with Gerald Rosenberg’s The Hollow Hope laying down a challenge that has never been fully answered to demonstrate powerful political effects from the judicial decision in Brown v. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 6:31 am
” J.S.A. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 12:30 pm
Fifth Circuit: An argument that is V for Vacuous. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 5:32 am
”Judge Easterbrook, who was appointed to the appeals court by President Ronald Reagan, relied on a 1905 Supreme Court decision, Jacobson v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:52 am
The case is entitled Dutcher et al. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:52 am
The case is entitled Dutcher et al. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Activists are exasperated that members of Congress and President Biden have not been able to push through federal legislation that would supersede the voting laws moving through state Legislatures across the country. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:36 am
Again, I wasn't initially sold, but I watched the further developments with an open mind and less than a year later I think--in light of the recent announcement by three United States Senators--that the CAF may go down in history as one of the most impactful and important policy efforts in the history of the tech industry.The tide has turned. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:40 pm
The case, Klaassen v. [read post]
