Search for: "State v. Liberator"
Results 5701 - 5720
of 7,776
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2012, 9:00 am
In Holden v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Because Democrats have passed laws in some states to protect the status quo, should the Supreme Court—freshly packed by Republicans with extreme ideologues—turn the question of abortion rights back to the states by overturning Roe v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:35 pm
The next question asked about the landmark case of Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 1:35 pm
Courts cite to these concessions liberally and there appears to be no set formula for what is sufficient. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
That was and will be the broadest statute to revive SOLs in the United States, because the Supreme Court considered the law and held that criminal SOLs may not be revived, because that would violate the Ex Post Facto Clause in Stogner v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 6:16 am
The PRC has modernized the People’s Liberation Army to offset U.S. military advantages and seeks to destabilize areas such as the East China Sea. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:27 am
United States and New Prime v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:12 am
The many critics of the Bush v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:31 am
Levine v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:09 am
He is a frequent commentator on constitutional issues and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:27 am
But, as for congressional action, Ali argued for an update to the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), which the Supreme Court invalidated in its seminal 1997 City of Boerne v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:54 pm
” J.S.A. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 7:49 am
The decision in Bostock v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 10:02 am
Cardozo concluded that the federal statute's taxing states that did not provide a federally approved UI scheme did not, therefore, "coerce" states but rather liberated them from a paralyzing inability to address the Great Depression. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 7:20 am
O’Connor v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 3:43 am
According to a statement that Tennessee Coordinator of Elections Mark Goins gave The Tennessean, the state’s Supreme Court “made it clear” in the 2023 case Falls v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:24 am
In particular, I hope to offer a grad student perspective in some of my future posts.Today, though, I wanted to address an entirely different topic--namely, the role of legal historians as advocates, an issue raised for me by Justice Scalia's dissent in the recent decision in Arizona v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:46 pm
Earlier today, the Supreme Court decided to hear Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 10:19 pm
" That language, with which Justice Kennedy tellingly opens his opinion for the Supreme Court in Romer v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 6:08 am
Here's Justice Stevens from his concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]
